WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

S 327

Relates to confidential informants

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Jamaal Bailey

Shifts teacher layoffs to protect a diverse, high-quality workforce by prioritizing performance and student needs; temporary 2026-2032, boosting teachers of color.

REFERRED TO CODES
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 327

Summary — S.327: "An Act enabling all students to thrive: protecting a high quality, diverse educator workforce"

Purpose

S.327 amends Massachusetts law governing teacher layoffs (G.L. c.71, §42) to change how reductions in force and reorganizations are implemented with the stated goal of protecting a high‑quality, diverse educator workforce and increasing the percentage of teachers of color in Massachusetts public schools.

Key provisions

  • Amends the seventh paragraph of G.L. c.71, §42 to limit when superintendents may lay off teachers with Professional Teacher Status (PTS).
    • A teacher with PTS generally may not be laid off if there exists a teacher without PTS (for the same position) or a less‑qualified PTS teacher in the same or similar position.
    • A more senior PTS teacher may not displace a junior PTS teacher unless the senior teacher is currently certified under §38G and is at least as qualified.
    • Collective bargaining may define additional qualification criteria consistent with chapter 150E, but the primary factors must be job performance indicators (including overall ratings from comprehensive evaluations pursuant to §38) and the best interests of students. The law makes no distinction between the overall ratings the Board defines as "proficient" or "exemplary."
  • Exempts, regardless of PTS and provided they did not receive an unsatisfactory evaluation in the prior year, teachers meeting any of these criteria from layoff:
    • Graduates of an in‑district secondary school or district "grow your own" prep program where the district has a higher than statewide share of high‑needs students (as defined by DESE).
    • Teach in a school in the top 20% of the district for percentage of high‑needs students.
    • Teach in a school in the top 20% of the district for lowest staff retention.
    • Designated by the Department as a Teacher of the Year.
    • Received the highest rating on a performance evaluation in either of the two school years immediately prior to the announced layoff.
    • Have specified linguistic proficiency (e.g., Bilingual Endorsement, passing M.T.E.L. foreign language test, Advanced Low on ACTFL OPI/WPT, or other district‑verified proficiency) in a language/dialect spoken by ≥5% of students or student households in the school/district.
  • Among remaining non‑PTS teachers, a teacher shall not be laid off if a less‑qualified non‑PTS teacher holds the same or similar position.
  • Seniority/length of service may only be used as a tiebreaker where qualifications are equal under collectively bargained criteria.
  • Requires the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) to evaluate the law’s effect on increasing teachers of color and submit a report with recommendations to the Legislature by June 30, 2031.

Effective period and repeal

  • Section 1 (the layoff provisions) takes effect April 30, 2026.
  • Section 1 is repealed (i.e., the changes expire) with Section 4 taking effect December 31, 2032 — making the provisions temporary (roughly a 6+ year window).

Who is affected

  • Public school teachers (with and without Professional Teacher Status)
  • Superintendents and school committees responsible for layoff decisions
  • Collective bargaining representatives and local contracts (chapter 150E)
  • Students—particularly in high‑needs and low‑retention schools—and communities with non‑English language/dialect needs
  • DESE (for reporting and definitions)

Procedural status & timeline (as provided)

  • Introduced January 16, 2025 (Senate Docket No. 1448 / Senate No. 327).
  • Read twice and referred to Committee on Finance (1/30/2025); also referred to committee on Education (2/27/2025) per records.
  • Hearings scheduled (e.g., 10/14/2025 and 12/02/2025).
  • Report to Legislature due by 6/30/2031.
  • Effective: 4/30/2026; repeal effective 12/31/2032.

Potential impacts and considerations

  • Shifts layoff decision emphasis from pure seniority toward performance and student‑need criteria, likely protecting high‑performing teachers, bilingual teachers, and those serving highest‑need schools.
  • Intended to support recruitment/retention of teachers of color and grow‑your‑own programs.
  • Could constrain district budget flexibility when making reductions in force.
  • Puts increased importance on consistent, robust evaluation systems and clear definitions (high‑needs, low retention, linguistic proficiency).
  • Implementation will require coordination with collective bargaining and local HR practices.

Note: The bill text identifies State Senator John J. Cronin as the petitioner/presenter. Metadata attached to the draft lists other sponsors (e.g., Catherine Cortez Masto, John Cornyn, Jamaal Bailey); readers should consult the official Senate clerk records for sponsor attribution and any clerical discrepancies.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.