WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

A 1432

Relates to codifying animal cruelty laws under the penal law; repealer

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Steven Raga and 2 co-sponsors

Authorizes districts and municipalities to install school bus monitoring cameras to detect illegal passings, with civil penalties, enforcement timelines, and video-retention rules.

REFERRED TO CODES
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · A 1432

Summary — A1432 (1R): Authorizes use of school bus monitoring systems

Status and timeline
- Introduced: January 9, 2024.
- Reported by Assembly Education Committee with amendments: September 19, 2024 (1R).
- Referred to Assembly Codes: January 9, 2025.
- Companion: S1469.

Purpose
- Authorizes municipalities and school districts to install, operate, or contract for school bus monitoring systems to detect and enforce illegal passing of school buses, and updates penalties, enforcement procedures, and evidence/retention rules related to violations.

Key provisions
- Authorization and contracting
- Municipalities or school districts that operate or provide Type I/II school buses may contract with private vendors to install, operate, and maintain school bus monitoring systems.
- A school district may require a contractor to install and maintain such systems on buses used for contracted routes.

  • Definition and minimum system capabilities

    • A school bus monitoring system must include at least one camera and computer and be capable of capturing and producing recorded images or video that show:
    • the school bus exhibiting flashing red lights;
    • a motor vehicle passing the bus;
    • the violating vehicle’s license plate, make and model; and
    • date, time, and location of the incident.

  • Penalties and enforcement

    • If a violation is NOT evidenced by a recorded image: updated criminal penalties under existing law — first offense: $250 fine and up to 15 days community service (imprisonment removed); subsequent offenses: $500 fine and at least 15 days community service.
    • If a violation IS evidenced by a recorded image from an authorized system: civil penalty of $250, collected via a summary proceeding under the Penalty Enforcement Law. A person found liable from camera evidence:
    • will not receive motor vehicle penalty points or automobile insurance eligibility points;
    • civil penalties collected are forwarded to the municipality’s financial officer and may be used for general municipal and school district purposes, including enforcement/education and monitoring efforts.
    • Law enforcement must issue a summons within 90 days of determining a suspected camera-captured violation; no summons may be issued more than 90 days after the violation occurred.

  • Owner liability and defenses

    • Rebuttable presumption that the registered owner was the operator.
    • Owner/lessor not liable if they show:
    • vehicle was used without consent and they identify the operator/registrant;
    • lessee had possession/was operating and the lessor provides lessee name/address; or
    • the vehicle was stolen at the time and a police report is provided.

Privacy, records retention, and evidentiary limits
- Recorded images/information from these systems:
- Are not public records under OPRA.
- Are not discoverable as public records except via grand jury subpoena or court order in a criminal matter.
- May not be offered in civil or administrative proceedings except when directly related to illegally passing a school bus.
- Retention:
- Images related to a violation that results in a civil penalty: retained up to 60 days after collection, then purged.
- Images not resulting in a summons: purged within 95 days of recording.

Fiscal and administrative impact (Office of Legislative Services)
- Indeterminate initial State expenditure increase (possible rulemaking workload for Motor Vehicle Commission; Supreme Court may adopt Rules of Court as needed).
- Indeterminate local fiscal effects: districts/municipalities that choose to implement systems will face initial and ongoing costs (equipment, maintenance, review time by local law enforcement), possibly offset in part by civil penalties and increased fines. Eliminating imprisonment could reduce county incarceration costs; new civil penalty revenues likely increase municipal revenues.

Committee amendments (notable)
- Added explicit authority for school districts to require installation on buses used in contractor-provided routes.
- Removed an original bill provision requiring the Commissioner of Education and the Superintendent of State Police to adopt rules and regulations (committee removed these specific rulemaking responsibilities).

Who is affected
- Motor vehicle drivers and registered vehicle owners (liability and fines).
- School districts, municipalities, and school bus contractors (may adopt systems and manage contracts).
- Local law enforcement (must review recorded images and issue summonses within set timeframes).
- Motor Vehicle Commission and courts (may incur administrative workload for any rule or procedural changes).

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.