Bill
S 1503
Massachusetts bill strengthens hospital closure rules: requires one-year advance DPH notice, broad community engagement, oversight, and penalties to protect essential services.
Status (as provided)
- Filed in the Massachusetts Senate: 01/10/2025 (Sen. Julian Cyr, lead sponsor)
- Read twice and referred: 04/29/2025; referred to Committee on Commerce, Economic Development and Small Business (also referred to Public Health per later action)
- Hearing scheduled/rescheduled for 09/29/2025
- Classification: bill
Purpose
- To strengthen notice, community engagement, oversight and continuity-of-care requirements when a hospital proposes to close or discontinue “essential health services,” and to limit closures during declared health-care emergencies.
Key provisions (what the bill would change)
- Replaces subsection (4) of section 51G, chapter 111 (MA General Laws) with new requirements.
- Advance notice timelines:
- Hospitals must notify the Department of Public Health (DPH) at least one calendar year before closing or discontinuing an essential health service.
- At least 30 days before notifying DPH, hospitals must inform (in writing or electronically) DPH and: the hospital’s patient & family council, all hospital staff, any labor organizations representing staff, state legislators for the municipality, and a local municipal official.
- Hospitals must provide a detailed account (at least 30 days prior to DPH notice) of prior community engagement and planning and any other information DPH requires.
- Distribution of notice copies: Hospitals must send copies of their DPH notice to the Health Policy Commission, Office of the Attorney General, Center for Health Information and Analysis, Executive Office of Labor & Workforce Development, relevant health care coalitions and identified community groups.
- Municipal input: The initial notice to DPH must include either statements of support/non-opposition from each municipality the hospital serves (as defined under section 16T, ch. 6A) or evidence that municipalities were given notice and opportunity to comment. Failure to meet this requirement means the notice date does not count toward the one‑year clock.
- DPH review and planning:
- DPH must determine whether the proposed discontinued services are necessary to preserve access and health in the service area.
- If necessary, DPH may require the hospital to submit a plan to assure continued access; plans must include a community oversight committee (representatives from each served municipality, non‑managerial hospital employees including RNs and ancillary staff, and a local interfaith representative).
- If continued access depends on other hospitals/facilities, the proposing hospital must include signed statements from those facilities affirming their capacity.
- DPH must hold a public hearing before making a determination on service or hospital closures.
- Licensing and community benefit obligations:
- No original license for an acute-care hospital (per section 25B) shall be granted unless the applicant submits an approved community benefits plan identifying essential health services; DPH may waive in part for applicants already providing substantial primary/preventive services.
- Enforcement and penalties:
- If a hospital discontinues an essential service without DPH-approved plan, the Attorney General may seek an injunction to maintain the service for the one‑year notice period.
- The hospital will be ineligible to have an application approved under section 25C for three years from the discontinuance, or until the service is restored or DPH is satisfied an adequate plan exists.
- Emergency restrictions:
- Hospitals may not close beds, units, or facilities during any declared state of emergency that pertains to health care.
Who would be affected
- Hospitals and health systems operating in Massachusetts (particularly those proposing service reductions or closures).
- Patients and communities served by those hospitals.
- Hospital staff, labor organizations and unions.
- Municipal governments and local officials in hospital service areas.
- State agencies involved in health oversight (DPH, Health Policy Commission, CHIA, AG, Executive Office of Labor & Workforce Development).
- Other hospitals/facilities that might absorb displaced services.
Procedural notes & related legislation
- The bill amends Section 51G, ch. 111 (current statute cited from 2022 Official Edition).
- References regulatory definitions (essential services defined by 105 CMR 130) and other statutory sections (e.g., ch. 6A §16T; section 25B and 25C).
- Related/companion measures noted in docket materials (e.g., HR 15, A 2411); prior-session bills S.7607 and S.2249 address similar topics.
Potential impacts and considerations
- Strengthens community notice, engagement and state oversight before closures, aiming to preserve access to essential services.
- May delay or complicate hospitals’ ability to reorganize services or close lines of care, increasing administrative/negotiation requirements (municipal sign-offs, oversight committees, inter-hospital agreements).
- Provides legal remedies (AG injunction, licensing/eligibility consequences) for premature or unauthorized discontinuances.
- Prevents closures during declared health-care emergencies, preserving surge capacity.
- Could influence hospital financial/planning decisions; requires coordination among hospitals, municipalities, labor groups and state agencies.
For more detail: the bill text replaces existing subsection (4) of G.L. c.111 §51G and should be consulted for exact statutory language and cross-references.
Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.
Sign in to ask a question.
