Regards conceal carry locations, nonresident firearms disability

136th Legislature (2025-2026) Introduced by Adam Mathews and 1 co-sponsor

Restores Granville and Vance counties and their towns' power to initiate down-zoning without all affected owners’ consent.

Referred to committee

#courts #courtsandcivillaw #crimeandpunishment #crimes #corrections #andlawenforcement #firearms

Main purpose

HB 68 restores local government authority in Granville and Vance Counties (and municipalities within them) to initiate zoning amendments that down‑zone property. The bill reverses a restriction enacted by Session Law 2024‑57 (amending G.S. 160D‑601(d)) that generally made down‑zoning unenforceable unless all affected property owners consented.

Key provisions

Amends G.S. 160D‑601(d) to re‑establish that a local government may initiate a down‑zoning amendment (i.e., local governments can adopt down‑zoning without unanimous written consent of affected property owners).

Retains the statutory definition of “down‑zoning” to include:

Decreasing allowed development density below prior allowances;
Reducing the permitted uses allowed on the land compared to prior allowances; and
Creating nonconformities on nonresidential land (nonconforming use, lot, structure, improvement, or site element).

Geographic limit: the act applies only to Granville and Vance Counties and any municipalities located in those counties (Section 2(a)).

Effective date and retroactivity: the act takes effect upon becoming law and applies retroactively to December 11, 2024. Ordinances affected by Section 3K.1 of S.L. 2024‑57 are to be treated as they were on or before December 11, 2024 (Section 2(b)).

Who or what would be affected

Local governments (Granville and Vance counties and their municipalities): regain the ability to initiate down‑zoning proposals and adopt zoning changes that reduce density or permitted uses.

Property owners and developers in those jurisdictions: may be subject to down‑zoning adopted without their written consent; potential impacts on development rights, permitted uses, and property valuations.

Planning/zoning boards, permitting authorities, and legal counsel: will need to process and defend zoning decisions and may see increased rezoning activity or legal challenges.

Procedural / timeline aspects

Effective immediately upon enactment and retroactive to Dec. 11, 2024 — meaning ordinances adopted during the period affected by S.L. 2024‑57 may be reinstated to their pre‑Dec. 11, 2024 status.

The bill is narrowly tailored as a local exception; it does not change the statewide rule created by S.L. 2024‑57 for other counties.

Potential legal and policy considerations

Restores local legislative flexibility to reduce density or permitted uses for land‑use policy reasons (e.g., growth management, environmental protection, character of communities).

Retroactive application could revive previously invalidated ordinances or affect pending litigation; may raise takings, vested‑rights, or due‑process issues in particular cases.

Concentrated local impact: the change is limited to two counties rather than restoring statewide authority.

If you want, I can:
- Compare the pre‑ and post‑S.L. 2024‑57 language side‑by‑side,
- Identify recent ordinances in Granville or Vance that could be affected, or
- Draft a one‑page explainer for affected property owners.

Bill