WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HR 8371

Reform Immigration Through Biometrics Act

119th Congress Introduced by Byron Donalds

The bill requires DHS to evaluate and report on the biometric entry/exit system’s operation, impact on travel/trade, privacy protections, and cross-border data sharing within 180 d

Referred to the Subcommittee on Border Security and Enforcement.
2
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HR 8371

Summary of HR 8371 — Reform Immigration Through Biometrics Act (115th/119th Congress, as described)

Note: This summary reflects the bill text and stated aims as introduced. It is not commentary on policy desirability or partisan implications.

Purpose and intent

  • The bill aims to evaluate and report on U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s (CBP) implementation of an integrated biometric entry and exit data system (referred to as the System) as authorized by the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA), section 110.
  • The overarching goal is to assess how the biometric entry/exit system operates, including its effects on travel, trade, security, and visa enforcement.

Key provisions and changes

Section 2: Evaluation of CBP’s implementation of the integrated biometric system

  • The Secretary of Homeland Security must, within 180 days of enactment, submit a comprehensive report to key committees in the House and Senate assessing the System.
  • Required contents of the report:
    • Impact on arrival and departure wait times.
    • Evaluation of audits of devices procured by the private sector.
    • Evaluation of prior and ongoing private-sector consultations.
    • Milestones and metrics of success already achieved, and whether they should be updated to fulfill congressional directives.
    • Risks associated with the System and strategies to mitigate them.
    • Effects on:
    • Legitimate travel and trade.
    • Counterterrorism efforts.
    • Identifying visa violators.
  • Protective principle: The reporting should ensure that biometric data collection minimizes disruption to movement of people and cargo while pursuing counterterrorism objectives and visa enforcement.

Data matching assessment

  • Also due within 180 days, the Secretary must provide a report on how the System currently matches biometric information for individuals leaving the United States against biometric data previously provided to U.S. government entities for international travel.
  • Scope: The report may include information on non-U.S. citizens; it shall not include information about U.S. citizens except to describe privacy protections related to facial recognition.

Additional data-sharing evaluation

  • Within 180 days, the Secretary must report on whether the Beyond the Border agreement’s data sharing with the Canadian Border Services Agency (relating to biographic data) has occurred and discuss impacts of that data-sharing arrangement.

Other biometric initiatives

  • The section clarifies that nothing in the bill limits the Department of Homeland Security’s authority to collect biometric data in other circumstances beyond those specified in the section.

Savings clause

  • Nothing in the section prohibits user fees permitted by law (specifically, Section 13031 of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985).

Who/what is affected

  • U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), including CBP, as it relates to the implementation and evaluation of the biometric entry/exit system.
  • Legislative committees: House Committee on Homeland Security, House Committee on the Judiciary, and their Senate counterparts (as specified in the bill for reporting and evaluation).
  • Private sector providers supplying devices and related services for the System (as the bill requires evaluation of audits and consultations with private sector entities).
  • The traveling public and trade, insofar as the System influences entry/exit processes, wait times, and border procedures.
  • Canadian data-sharing arrangements under Beyond the Border, insofar as they relate to biometric/biographic data matching.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Introduction date: April 20, 2026.
  • Referred to:
    • House Judiciary Committee.
    • House Homeland Security Committee.
    • Subcommittee on Border Security and Enforcement (later action), per action history.
  • Reporting timelines:
    • Primary report due within 180 days after enactment for the System evaluation, data matching assessment, and Canada data-sharing evaluation.
  • The bill sets up a framework for ongoing oversight and evaluation rather than immediate changes to biometric collection authorities, with emphasis on reporting and assessing existing and planned implementation.

Potential impacts and considerations

  • Focus on transparency: The bill mandates detailed oversight reports to Congress, potentially informing future policy decisions on biometric systems.
  • Operational transparency: By evaluating wait times, audits, and private-sector engagement, the bill seeks to identify efficiency and security trade-offs.
  • Privacy and civil liberties: Reports include privacy protections for U.S. citizens in relation to facial recognition, and de-emphasize US citizen data in some contexts.
  • International data sharing: The bill contemplates the implications of cross-border data-sharing agreements and their effects on security and privacy.
  • Flexibility: The clause preserving other biometric initiatives allows DHS to pursue additional biometric activities outside the System, without limiting existing authorities.

If you’d like, I can tailor this summary for a policy brief, a layperson’s FAQ, or a one-page briefing for a stakeholder group.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.