Redefines covered person under Daniel's Law protection to include persons employed in other states.

2026-2027 Regular Session Introduced by Parker Space and 1 co-sponsor

Expands Daniel’s Law to cover individuals employed outside New Jersey, broadening protections and applicability to interstate workers.

Summary of Bill S 4586 (New Jersey, Session 222)

Purpose and intent

This bill redefines who is considered a “covered person” under Daniel’s Law protections to include individuals employed in states other than New Jersey. The goal is to expand protections and applicability of Daniel’s Law to a broader set of individuals who may be at risk due to domestic violence, stalking, or protective-order concerns, regardless of whether their employment or residence is entirely within New Jersey.

Key provisions and changes

Expansion of “covered person” definition:

The core change is broadening the statutory definition so that individuals employed in jurisdictions outside New Jersey are included within the scope of Daniel’s Law protections. Previously, coverage may have been limited to certain categories within New Jersey; the bill extends coverage to those employed elsewhere but connected to the protections under Daniel’s Law.

Protection scope adjustments:

By including out-of-state employees, the bill potentially extends related safety measures, reporting requirements, and remedies to a wider workforce.

Sponsor input:

Co-sponsors include Parker Space and Brian Stack, indicating bipartisan or regional support for broadening protective coverage.

Who would be affected

Covered persons: Individuals currently protected under Daniel’s Law who are employed in states other than New Jersey would now be explicitly included.

Employers and institutions: Employers with staff who work across state lines or in other states but are connected to New Jersey-based protective-law protections may need to ensure compliance with Daniel’s Law requirements for those employees.

Potential victims and families: More individuals who are in protective relationships or at risk may gain access to the law’s protections when employed outside New Jersey.

Procedural and timeline aspects

The summary does not specify specific implementation timelines, regulatory rules, or funding provisions. If enacted, agencies administering Daniel’s Law would issue guidance to reflect the expanded definition and ensure cross-state applicability.

Sponsors listed: Parker Space and Brian Stack (co-sponsors), suggesting active consideration and potential movement through the legislative process.

Practical impact and considerations

Compliance considerations: Employers with interstate staff may need to review policies to ensure alignment with Daniel’s Law protections for out-of-state employees.

Interstate coordination: The bill raises considerations about coordination with other states’ laws and how protective orders, reporting, and enforcement mechanisms interact across jurisdictions.

Clarity needs: Any future amendments should clarify how protections apply in cross-border employment scenarios, including electronic communications, safety planning, and enforcement.

If you’d like, I can tailor this summary to focus on specific sections of the bill once the statutory text is available, or add a brief comparison to current law to illustrate the exact expansion.