WeVote
Log In

Bill

YA

Bill

HRES 1147

Recognizing the United States legacy of dismissed pain and denied autonomy in women's health care, and affirming the Federal Government's duty to protect individual dignity and advance patient-centered care in women's health.

119th Congress Introduced by Yassamin Ansari and 21 co-sponsors

House resolution acknowledges historical dismissal of women's pain in healthcare and commits federal government to advancing patient-centered, dignity-respecting women's health services.

Submitted in House
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HRES 1147

Legislative bill overview

HRES 1147 is a House resolution that acknowledges historical patterns of dismissing women's pain and limiting their autonomy in U.S. healthcare systems. The resolution affirms the federal government's responsibility to prioritize patient-centered care and protect individual dignity in women's health services. As a resolution, it carries no binding legal force but serves as a statement of congressional position.

Why is this important

This resolution addresses documented disparities in how women's medical concerns are treated, including undertreatment of pain, delayed diagnoses, and reduced involvement in treatment decisions. Recognition at the federal level could influence healthcare policy priorities, medical training standards, and funding decisions affecting women's health outcomes. It reflects growing attention to gender-based healthcare inequities that research suggests contribute to worse health outcomes for women across multiple conditions.

Potential points of contention

  • Scope and specificity: Critics may argue the resolution is vague about which specific healthcare practices need reform, making it difficult to translate recognition into concrete policy changes or to measure success.
  • Resource implications: While non-binding, the resolution could be cited to justify increased federal spending on women's health initiatives or regulatory changes that some stakeholders view as costly or burdensome.
  • Medical practice autonomy: Some healthcare providers may resist implications that current practices are systematically dismissive, potentially viewing the resolution as politicizing clinical decision-making rather than addressing genuine medical evidence gaps.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.