Bill

BILL • US HOUSE

HRES 414

Recognizing that the United States has a moral and legal obligation to provide reparations for the crime of enslavement of Africans and its lasting harm on the lives of millions of Black people in the United States.

119th Congress
Introduced by Jasmine Crockett, Valerie Foushee, Al Green and 11 other co-sponsors

Declares federal responsibility to provide reparations for slavery and its harms, endorsing H.R.40, a Truth Commission, and related reparations actions.

Submitted in House
0
0
Bill Summary • HRES 414

Overview

HRES 414 is a House of Representatives resolution introduced on May 15, 2025. It recognizes a federal obligation to provide reparations for the enslavement of Africans and its enduring harms on Black people in the United States. The resolution encourages support for existing reparations-related legislation and commissions, and calls for national, state, and local initiatives to identify sources of reparations demands. It also includes an explicit moral acknowledgment and apology for slavery.

Main purpose and intent

  • Declare that the Federal Government has a responsibility to provide reparations, in all necessary forms (including financial compensation), to address ongoing harms caused by violations of Black Americans’ rights, including self-determination and freedom from discrimination in housing, health, education, life, security, water and sanitation, and a healthy environment.
  • Promote action by supporting and implementing existing reparations-related mechanisms and inquiries.

Key provisions

  1. Recognition of responsibility and form of reparations
    • Calls for reparations to rectify ongoing harms in multiple areas (housing, health, education, life, security, water/sanitation, environment) and to include financial compensation as appropriate.
  2. Support for H.R. 40
    • Encourages support, passage, and implementation of H.R. 40 (Commission to Study and Develop Reparation Proposals for African-Americans Act), which has been introduced annually since 1989.
  3. Creation of a Truth, Racial Healing, and Transformation body
    • Encourages reintroduction, passage, and implementation of legislation establishing a United States Commission on Truth, Racial Healing, and Transformation.
  4. Acknowledgment and apologies for slavery
    • Acknowledges state-sanctioned chattel slavery and encourages reintroduction and enactment of resolutions apologizing for slavery (without limiting clauses).
  5. Recognition of legacy organizations
    • Acknowledges the role of legacy, grassroots, and national organizations in the modern reparations movement.
  6. Local, state, and federal initiatives
    • Encourages initiatives to identify sources of reparations demands arising from slavery and its impacts.
  7. Honor and remembrance
    • Honors the lives and legacies of those affected by slavery and related state-sanctioned violence and discrimination.

Who would be affected

  • The resolution signals intent that the federal government consider reparations mechanisms and policies. It would guide, encourage, and potentially influence policymakers, advocacy groups, and federal agencies involved in reparations discussions.
  • It may affect organizations pursuing H.R. 40 studies, truth-telling commissions, and grassroots reparations initiatives at local, state, and federal levels.

Legislative actions and status

  • Introduced: May 15, 2025
  • Referred to: House Committee on the Judiciary
  • Status: Submitted in the House (H.Res. 414)

Sponsors

  • Primary sponsor: Summer L. Lee
  • Additional sponsors (cosponsors): LaMonica McIver, Nikema Williams, Al Green, Valerie P. Foushee, Delia C. Ramirez, Henry C. "Hank" Johnson, Lateefah Simon, Ayanna Pressley, Shri Thanedar, Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib, Jonathan L. Jackson, Jasmine Crockett
  • The roster includes multiple members from diverse backgrounds, signaling broad organizational and partisan interest in reparations discussions.

Potential impact and notes

  • This is a non-binding resolution that expresses the House’s stance and sets policy directions (e.g., support for H.R. 40 and a Truth Commission).
  • It could influence future legislative priorities, hearings, and funding considerations related to reparations and truth-reconciliation efforts.
  • By endorsing financial and non-financial forms of reparations, it broadens the framing of reparations discussions beyond symbolic apologies to substantive policy proposals.

Hi! I'm your AI assistant for HRES 414. I can help you understand its provisions, impacts, and answer any questions.

Key Provisions Impacts Timeline
Sign in to chat