WeVote

Bill

Bill

HR 9387

REAL Butter Act

119th Congress Introduced by Mike Bost and 9 co-sponsors

Requires lab-created butter to be labeled with “lab-created butter” or “contains lab-created butter” before the product name.

Introduced in House
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HR 9387

Overview

  • Bill: H.R. 9387 (119th Congress)
  • Title: Recognizing Engineered Alternatives as Lab-Created Butter Act (REAL Butter Act)
  • Purpose: Amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to ensure truthful labeling of lab-created butter and protect consumer choice.
  • Introduced: June 22, 2026, by Rep. Wied (with multiple co-sponsors). Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

What the bill does

  • Adds a new labeling requirement to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act), specifically to Section 403, addressing lab-created or synthesized butter products.
  • Requirement: Any product marketed as butter that uses non-agricultural, synthesized milkfat must include explicit labeling either:
    • “lab-created butter” or
    • “contains lab-created butter” immediately before the product name on the label.
  • Defines key terms:
    • “Synthesized butter product”: A product that is marketed as butter but uses milkfat sources synthesized through non-agricultural processes and does not conform to the Federal standard of identity for butter established in the 1923 law.
    • “Butter”: The term has the same meaning as in the 1923 standard (42 Stat. 1500).

Who/what is affected

  • Laboratory-produced or synthesized butter products that would otherwise be marketed as butter but rely on non-agricultural milkfat synthesis.
  • Manufacturers, marketers, and labelers of butter-like products that do not meet the traditional standard of identity for butter.

Key provisions and changes

  • Establishes a clear labeling standard to ensure consumer awareness when a product is lab-created or contains lab-created butter.
  • Ties labeling to the standard of identity for butter from the 1923 Act, ensuring consistency with historical definitions while introducing transparency for newer synthesized products.
  • No new federal standards of identity for butter are created; instead, the bill enforces labeling to distinguish synthesized products from traditional dairy butter.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Status: Introduced in the House and referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce on June 22, 2026.
  • No further actions (as of the provided text) such as passage, Senate action, or White House consideration are listed.
  • If enacted, the labeling requirements would take effect as part of the FD&C Act amendments, with the effective date to be determined by implementing regulations (not specified in the bill text provided).

Potential impact

  • Consumer clarity: Shoppers would easily identify whether a butter-like product is traditional dairy butter or a lab-created alternative.
  • Market transparency: Stores and manufacturers would need to adjust packaging to include the specified labeling on affected products.
  • Industry implications: May incentivize or deter certain product development based on labeling costs and consumer reception; could influence competition between traditional dairy butter producers and synthesized fat products.
  • Regulatory alignment: Aligns with long-standing standards of identity while introducing a modern disclosure requirement for innovative food production methods.

If you’d like, I can compare this bill to existing labeling requirements or provide a short risk/benefit assessment for different stakeholder groups.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.