WeVote
Log In

Bill

MB

Bill

HR 9340

Ratepayer Protection Act

119th Congress Introduced by Michael Baumgartner and 7 co-sponsors

The bill requires utilities to recover full incremental upgrade costs for large-load customers (≥100 MW) via rate design, with customer contributions and federal/state implementati

Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HR 9340

Summary of HR 9340 (119th Congress) – Ratepayer Protection Act

Purpose and intent

  • Introduces a federal standard to ensure that the costs of upgrades triggered by large-load electric customers are fully recovered by the electric utility.
  • Aims to protect ratepayers by requiring that large-load customers—defined below—share in the cost of generation, transmission, or distribution upgrades needed to serve their load, including upgrades even if the customer later terminates the contract or stops purchasing energy.

Key provisions

  1. Federal standard for large-load customers (new Section 111(d)(22))

    • Electric utilities must design rates charged to large-load customers to recover the full, incremental cost of upgrades necessary to serve the customer’s load.
    • Upgrades cover generation, transmission, and distribution improvements.
    • If a large-load customer terminates a contract or ceases purchasing energy, the rate must still ensure the utility can recover the cost.

  2. Financial assurances and contributions (within the same standard)

    • Before making any upgrade for a large-load customer, the utility must obtain financial assurances or contributions from the customer to cover the upgrade costs.

  3. Definition of a large-load customer (within the standard)

    • A non-residential electric consumer that, on or after enactment, enters into (or requests to enter into) a contract for one or more facilities that have a combined peak demand of at least 100 megawatts at a single site or campus.

  4. Conforming amendments to enable implementation (Section 112)

    • Requires state regulatory authorities and nonregulated electric utilities to begin consideration of the standard (under section 111) within specified timelines:
      • By 1 year after enactment: commence consideration or set a hearing date.
      • By 2 years after enactment: complete consideration and make a determination under the standard.
    • Adjustments to cross-references to reflect the new standard and clarify implementation timing.

  5. Clarifications and transitional provisions (Section 112(c) and 124)

    • Aligns existing procedures with the new standard’s enactment date.
    • Provides that the reference to enactment dates for the purposes of ongoing or pending proceedings is to be understood as the enactment date of paragraph (22) (the new standard).
    • Adds a provision to ensure prior/state actions that implemented or were in process regarding a comparable standard may not be required to restart if they meet the new standard’s intent under certain conditions.

Who would be affected

  • Large-load, non-residential customers (defined as facilities with aggregate peak demand of 100 MW or more at a single site/campus): subject to rate recovery rules ensuring full incremental upgrade costs are recovered, and required to provide financial assurances or contributions for upgrades.
  • Electric utilities: required to design rates accordingly, obtain customer contributions or assurances, and pursue the upgrade projects with clear cost recovery mechanics.
  • State regulatory authorities and nonregulated electric utilities: tasked with implementing and reviewing compliance with the new federal standard within set timelines.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Effective date: Immediate upon enactment for purposes of the standard, with phased timelines for state-level consideration:
    • Within 1 year: states and utilities must commence consideration or set hearings regarding the standard.
    • Within 2 years: states and utilities must complete consideration and determine compliance under the standard.
  • The bill modifies existing sections of the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA) to insert the new standard and ensure coordination between federal standard and state ratemaking processes.
  • The act includes conforming amendments to maintain consistency with the new standard and addresses prior and pending proceedings by referencing the enactment date of the new paragraph.

Potential impact (high-level)

  • Increases ratepayer protection by ensuring large-load customers contribute to and share in the costs of upgrades required to serve their demand.
  • Accelerates or incentivizes utilities to recover full upgrade costs through customer-specific rates, potentially reducing the risk of cost-shifting to other ratepayers.
  • Creates a defined threshold (100 MW) for which the policy applies, focusing on large industrial/commercial loads.
  • Establishes explicit timelines for regulatory proceedings, promoting clearer and faster consideration at the state level.

Notes:
- The bill is introduced by Rep. Evans (with Rep. Castor as a co-sponsor) and is labeled as a ratepayer protection measure within PURPA.
- As with any bill, final impact will depend on subsequent committee actions, potential amendments, and eventual passage into law.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.