WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 786

Psychologists - As introduced, requires that test materials and test data from psychological or neuropsychological testing be kept secure to avoid compromising the validity of the testing; makes other changes related to security of psychological or neuropsychological test materials and test data. - Amends TCA Title 63, Chapter 11.

114th Regular Session (2025-2026)

Tennessee bill requiring psychologists to secure psychological test materials and data to preserve testing validity and prevent unauthorized disclosure.

Passed on Second Consideration, refer to Senate Health and Welfare Committee
#psychologists
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 786

Legislative bill overview

SB 786 requires psychologists in Tennessee to implement security measures protecting psychological and neuropsychological test materials and data from unauthorized access or disclosure. The bill modifies existing regulations under Tennessee Code Annotated Title 63, Chapter 11, which governs the practice of psychology in the state.

Why is this important

Psychological tests are standardized instruments whose validity depends on their secrecy—if test questions become public knowledge, results become unreliable and meaningless for diagnosis and treatment planning. This bill establishes legal requirements to prevent test compromise, protecting both the integrity of mental health services and patient privacy.

Potential points of contention

  • Definition ambiguity: The bill doesn't specify what security measures qualify as "secure" or which entities must comply, potentially creating compliance confusion for private practitioners, clinics, and institutions
  • Data access restrictions: Heightened security requirements may create tension with patients' rights to access their own test data and results, and with legitimate research or quality assurance needs
  • Implementation costs: Small psychology practices may face financial burdens implementing robust security systems for test storage and digital records, potentially disadvantaging independent practitioners

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.