WeVote

Bill

Bill

HB 2413

Enhancing the criminal penalty for an offense committed with the intent to commit transnational repression, requiring the development of transnational repression recognition and response training, providing that theft of livestock or implements of husbandry is a severity level 5, nonperson felony, providing that the theft of grain or hay is a severity level 6, nonperson felony and providing that certain portions of the crime of cruelty to animals do not apply to any person who catches a feral cat to provide vaccination, spaying or neutering and returns such cat back to the location where such cat is caught.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Kevin Schwertfeger and 1 co-sponsor

Kansas bill makes livestock and farm equipment theft a severity level 5 felony to strengthen penalties against agricultural property crimes in rural communities.

Engrossed on Monday, March 30, 2026
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 2413

Legislative bill overview

HB 2413 reclassifies theft of livestock or farm implements as a severity level 5 nonperson felony in Kansas. Previously, such thefts may have been prosecuted under different penalty structures. The bill standardizes criminal penalties for agricultural property crimes.

Why is this important

Agricultural theft significantly impacts rural economies and farming operations, particularly in Kansas where livestock and farm equipment represent substantial capital investments. Clear, consistent felony penalties aim to deter such crimes and provide law enforcement with stronger enforcement tools in agricultural communities.

Potential points of contention

  • Rural vs. urban application: The severity level 5 felony designation may disproportionately affect rural areas where agricultural theft is more common, raising questions about prosecutorial discretion and resource allocation
  • Proportionality debate: Critics may argue that nonperson felonies (carrying mandatory minimum sentences) could be excessive for first-time offenders or theft of lower-value equipment, while supporters contend it matches the economic harm
  • Implementation clarity: The bill's definition of "implements of husbandry" may create ambiguity in distinguishing eligible farm equipment from other property, potentially leading to inconsistent prosecution

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.