Providing for regulation of AI

2025 Regular Session

Proposes a regulatory framework for AI, establishing oversight and compliance rules for developers, vendors, platforms, and users to address safety, privacy, and accountability.

(LC) Draft Died in Process

#communications(seealso:informationtechnology) #informationtechnology(seealso:communications)

Overview

LC 3 is a bill titled “Providing for regulation of AI.” Based on the title and the metadata provided, the bill appears to address regulatory governance related to artificial intelligence within the realms of communications and information technology. The actual text of the bill, however, has not been provided here, so specific provisions, definitions, and regulatory mechanisms are not available in this summary.

Key Details

Bill Number: LC 3

Title: Providing for regulation of AI

Classification/Subject: Bill; Communications and Information Technology

Introduced: August 27, 2024

Status: Draft; Died in Process (as of May 22, 2025)

Actions to Date:

2024-08-27: Drafter Assigned
2025-01-31: Draft On Hold
2025-05-22: Draft Died in Process

What the bill would do (based on the title; text not provided)

The bill likely sought to establish regulatory governing frameworks for artificial intelligence, potentially including oversight, accountability, and compliance requirements for AI developers and users. However, without the actual text, the precise aims (e.g., licensing, safety standards, transparency requirements, data handling, or enforcement mechanisms) cannot be confirmed.

Given its classification in Communications and Information Technology, the regulation could touch on how AI systems operate within information networks, data privacy, disclosure to users, or interoperability standards.

Who/what would be affected

AI developers, vendors, and platforms deploying AI technologies

Organizations and individuals using or distributing AI-powered tools

Regulatory agencies or bodies responsible for AI oversight

Entities involved in communications or information technology that intersect with AI use (e.g., social media platforms, search services, data processing firms)

Procedural and timeline aspects

The bill was introduced in August 2024 and generated a draft completed by a drafter.

It moved to a paused status (On Hold) in January 2025.

In May 2025, the draft was designated as Died in Process, indicating it did not advance toward enactment in its current form.

As of the provided information, there are no active steps moving forward with this bill. If revived, it could be reintroduced with revisions, possibly re-prioritized or restructured for consideration.

Potential impacts and considerations (high level)

If enacted, compliance costs for AI developers and users could be relevant (reporting, testing, safety requirements).

Data privacy, security, and accountability implications for AI systems may arise.

Regulatory alignment with existing federal or state frameworks and with international norms could be factors.

Stakeholders might weigh innovation incentives against consumer protections and safety standards.

Next steps

For those interested, track any future reintroduction or revised AI-regulation proposals in the same legislative track or related committees.

When the full text becomes available, a detailed, provision-by-provision analysis can be provided to identify specific requirements, timelines, penalties, exemptions, and enforcement mechanisms.

Bill