WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

A 8099

Provides regulatory control of Internet service providers by the public service commission, requires Internet neutrality and relates to the placement of equipment on utility poles

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Clyde Vanel

Shifts ISP regulation to the state Public Service Commission, requires net neutrality, and regulates pole attachments for ISP equipment on utility poles.

REFERRED TO CORPORATIONS, AUTHORITIES AND COMMISSIONS
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · A 8099

Summary of Assembly Bill A 8099

Quick overview

  • Bill number: A 8099
  • Title: Provides regulatory control of Internet service providers by the public service commission, requires Internet neutrality and relates to the placement of equipment on utility poles
  • Sponsor: Clyde Vanel (primary)
  • Introduced: April 30, 2025
  • Status: Referred to the Assembly Committee on Corporations, Authorities and Commissions
  • Related/companion bills: S 3860 (companion), A 3910 (prior-session), A 3642 (prior-session), A 2611 (prior-session), S 8321 (prior-session)

What the bill would do (primary purpose)

  • Establish regulatory oversight of Internet service providers (ISPs) by the state Public Service Commission (PSC).
  • Impose a requirement for Internet neutrality (net neutrality) within the state, mandating non-discriminatory treatment of internet traffic by ISPs.
  • Address the placement and management of ISP equipment on utility poles, implying PSC involvement in pole attachment policies or oversight.

Key provisions and changes (illustrative, based on description)

  • Regulatory jurisdiction: The PSC would have regulatory authority over ISPs operating within the state, expanding or clarifying the PSC’s reach to internet service delivery practices and related service issues.
  • Net neutrality mandate: ISPs would be required to adhere to net neutrality standards, preventing discrimination in traffic handling, prioritization, blocking, or throttling of online content and applications.
  • Pole attachments: The bill connects PSC oversight to the placement and management of ISP equipment on utility poles, potentially affecting permitting, safety standards, access rights, and related fees or processes for attaching infrastructure (e.g., fiber cables, wireless equipment, or other hardware) to poles used by utility companies.
  • Compliance and enforcement framework: While not detailed in the provided synopsis, the bill would typically establish penalties, enforcement mechanisms, and reporting requirements to ensure ISP and pole-attachment compliance.

Who would be affected

  • Internet service providers (ISPs): Subject to PSC regulation, net neutrality requirements, and pole-attachment rules.
  • Utility companies (pole owners): Interaction with ISPs for pole space, safety compliance, and permitting as elements of the bill’s pole-attachment provisions.
  • Consumers and businesses: Potential outcomes include clearer service standards, protections against discriminatory practices, and enhanced transparency in ISP operations.
  • State and local governments: Possibly involved in implementing or coordinating with PSC rules and related infrastructure permitting.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • The bill has been referred to the Assembly committee on Corporations, Authorities and Commissions, indicating it is in the early legislative stage and subject to hearings, amendments, and votes within the committee.
  • No effective date or implementation timeline is specified in the provided information; such details would typically be established in the bill text or in subsequent legislative actions (e.g., rulemaking by the PSC, or phased compliance requirements).

Potential impact and considerations

  • The bill would shift regulatory oversight of ISPs to the PSC, potentially increasing state-level scrutiny of pricing, service levels, and traffic management practices.
  • Net neutrality requirements could influence how ISPs manage traffic and prioritize services, with potential implications for investment incentives and service innovation.
  • Pole-attachment provisions may affect infrastructure deployment timelines and costs for ISPs, as well as safety and coordination requirements with utility pole owners.
  • Stakeholders include ISPs, utility and municipal utility-Electric/Gas/Telecom operators, consumers, and policymakers weighing regulatory burdens against consumer protections and connectivity goals.

Notes

  • This summary reflects the bill’s stated aims and described provisions. The exact text would specify definitions, scope, enforcement mechanisms, penalties, and timelines. For a complete understanding, reviewing the bill’s official language and any fiscal notes or committee reports would be essential.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.