WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 3140

Provides for mileage reimbursements for dual enrollment courses for college credit

2026 Regular Session Introduced by Tonya Rush and 1 co-sponsor

Missouri bill would reimburse mileage expenses for high school students attending dual enrollment college courses, removing a transportation cost barrier to early college credit.

Referred: Emerging Issues(H)
#childrenandminors #education #elementaryandsecondary #higher #elementaryandsecondaryeducation #dept.of
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 3140

Legislative bill overview

HB 3140 establishes a mileage reimbursement program for students enrolled in dual enrollment courses that provide college credit. The bill would compensate students (or their families) for travel expenses incurred while attending these courses, which are typically held at community colleges or universities but taken by high school students. This represents a state-level intervention to reduce financial barriers to dual enrollment participation.

Why is this important

Dual enrollment programs allow high school students to earn college credits before graduation, reducing college costs and time-to-degree. However, transportation costs can be a significant barrier for rural students or those without reliable vehicles. By covering mileage, the state could increase access to these programs, particularly benefiting lower-income families who might otherwise forgo dual enrollment due to transportation expenses.

Potential points of contention

  • Program cost and funding source: The bill's fiscal impact is unclear—reimbursing statewide mileage could be expensive depending on participation rates, reimbursement rates, and which students qualify
  • Eligibility criteria and implementation: The bill doesn't specify whether all students qualify, income thresholds, distance requirements, or administrative mechanics (who processes claims, verification methods)
  • Equity concerns: Mileage reimbursement may not fully address transportation barriers for students without vehicles and could primarily benefit families with cars, potentially creating a different equity issue

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.