WeVote

Bill

Bill

S 596

Provides a rebuttable presumption relating to recertification as a minority and women-owned business enterprise

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Jeremy Cooney and 6 co-sponsors

Allows bow-hunting from an elevated tree stand provided it is at least 250 feet from any dwelling in use, unless the owner/occupant authorizes closer.

RETURNED TO SENATE
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 596

Summary — S.596 (Massachusetts): "An Act relative to hunting near a dwelling"

Purpose

This bill amends Massachusetts hunting law to explicitly allow hunting with a bow and arrow from an elevated tree stand at a specified distance from occupied dwellings, unless the dwelling’s owner or occupant authorizes otherwise. Its intent is to permit a commonly used bow‑hunting practice while setting a minimum separation from homes.

Key provision (exact language inserted)

Section 58 of chapter 131 of the General Laws is amended by inserting after the word “thereof” the following:
", provided that a person may hunt with a bow and arrow from an elevated tree stand not less than 250 feet from any dwelling in use except as authorized by the owner or occupant thereof".

In plain terms:
- Permits hunting with a bow and arrow from an elevated tree stand.
- Requires a minimum distance of 250 feet from any dwelling “in use.”
- Creates an exception when the owner or occupant of the dwelling expressly authorizes hunting closer than 250 feet.

Who would be affected

  • Hunters: Bow hunters using elevated tree stands would be explicitly allowed to hunt when at least 250 feet from occupied dwellings (subject to other hunting rules).
  • Landowners and residents: Homeowners/occupants within hunting areas gain a clear statutory right to withhold authorization for closer hunting; they may also be affected by increased hunting activity on nearby land.
  • Law enforcement and wildlife agencies: Responsible for interpreting and enforcing the 250‑foot requirement and any disputes about authorization and whether a dwelling is “in use.”
  • Municipalities and conservation/land managers: May need to adjust local guidance, signage, or outreach to notify residents and hunters about permissible practices.

Legislative status & timeline (selected actions)

  • Introduced in Senate: 02/13/2025 (presented by Sen. Ryan C. Fattman)
  • Referred to Committee on Energy and Natural Resources / Environment and Natural Resources; hearing(s) held (03/12/2025)
  • Advanced to third reading; passed Senate: 05/13/2025
  • Delivered to Assembly and referred to Governmental Operations; passed Assembly (substituted for A2296): 05/29/2025
  • Returned to Senate: 05/29/2025
  • Status shown: RETURNED TO SENATE. Additional hearings and study orders noted in late 2025.

Notes / potential impacts to consider

  • The bill is narrow in scope and does not change other prohibitions or licensing requirements in chapter 131.
  • Practical enforcement issues may arise (measuring the 250‑foot buffer, determining whether a dwelling is “in use,” and verifying owner authorization).
  • Public safety and neighbor relations are likely to be primary policy concerns discussed in hearings.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.