WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

LB 935

Provide for court fees; change provisions relating to incentives for rural legal practice, protection orders, hearsay, sentencing, support order liens, and paternity proceedings; provide for no-contact periods for victims of certain assaults and civil actions for conduct relating to prohibited content or child exploitation devices; and provide for and change offenses involving mobile tracking devices, stalking, unlawful intrusion, operation of unmanned aircraft systems, and swatting

109th Legislature (2025-2026) Introduced by Carolyn Bosn and 1 co-sponsor

LB 935 would require Nebraska political subdivisions to pay prevailing plaintiffs' attorney's fees and costs in certain lawsuits, shifting legal expense risks from individuals to government entities.

Presented to Governor on April 10, 2026
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · LB 935

Legislative bill overview

LB 935 would allow prevailing parties to recover costs and attorney's fees in certain lawsuits against Nebraska political subdivisions (cities, counties, school districts, etc.). The bill aims to create financial incentives for challenging governmental entities in court by shifting legal costs to the losing party rather than requiring each side to bear their own expenses.

Why is this important

This change could significantly affect access to justice and litigation strategy. It may encourage more challenges to local government decisions by reducing financial barriers, but could also increase defensive costs for already-stretched municipal budgets. The policy reflects broader debates about governmental accountability versus fiscal protection of public entities.

Potential points of contention

  • Scope definition: Which specific actions qualify for fee-shifting? The bill's language will determine whether it applies narrowly (certain constitutional claims) or broadly (most disputes with government), dramatically affecting impact.
  • Public budget impact: Cities, counties, and school districts would face higher litigation costs when they lose cases, potentially redirecting funds from services to legal expenses.
  • Access equity: While fee-shifting may help well-funded plaintiffs pursue claims, it could still disadvantage lower-income individuals who cannot afford upfront legal costs while awaiting recovery.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.