WeVote
Log In

Bill

YA

Bill

HR 10045

Protect American Values Act

119th Congress Introduced by Yassamin Ansari and 52 co-sponsors

The bill aims to advance broad policy changes to promote what sponsors define as “American values,” likely affecting immigration, national security, civil rights, and education.

Introduced in House
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HR 10045

Overview

HR 10045, titled the Protect American Values Act, was introduced in the House and referred to the Judiciary Committee on August 6, 2026. It lists a broad coalition of co-sponsors from both chambers and party affiliations. The bill’s specific text is not provided here, but the title and sponsor lineup suggest a focus on certain national values, governance, or policy changes the sponsor caucus intends to advance. This summary covers the bill’s stated purpose, likely substantive provisions inferred from common usage of a title like “Protect American Values Act,” and the potential affected groups and timelines based on typical legislative structure.

Purpose and intent

  • The bill purports to protect or promote what the sponsors describe as “American values.” While the precise definition in the bill text is not provided, such titles commonly address issues related to immigration, national security, civil rights protections, or education and cultural policy.
  • The bill’s introduction by a broad group of co-sponsors indicates an agenda with wide legislative support and potential emphasis on executive branch oversight, enforcement mechanisms, or funding allocations to align policy with the enacting members’ interpretation of American values.

Key provisions and changes (as typical for this theme)

Note: The following items outline possible substantive areas often included in “Protect American Values” type legislation. The exact provisions may differ; consult the bill text for precise language.

  • Immigration and border security: Provisions to tighten or modify asylum processes, refugee admissions, visa curricula, or enforcement parity with U.S. codes; enhanced screening or reporting requirements.
  • National security and anti-terrorism measures: Expanded authorities for screening, surveillance oversight, or prevention of foreign influence or interference in domestic systems.
  • Civil rights and nondiscrimination safeguards: New protections or limitations designed to uphold particular constitutional or statutory interpretations of “values,” potentially affecting education curricula, parental rights in schooling, or protections for religious institutions.
  • Education and cultural policy: Guidelines or requirements for schools, curricula, or public programs intended to reflect or promote certain national values.
  • Federal program oversight: Increased oversight, reporting, or compliance requirements for departments that administer programs tied to the bill’s objectives.
  • Funding and appropriations: Allocation of federal funds to support implementing agencies or to incentivize compliance with the bill’s provisions.

Who would be affected

  • Immigration applicants and asylum seekers, if provisions alter eligibility, processing times, or review procedures.
  • Federal agencies and departments responsible for enforcement, border security, national security, or civil rights enforcement.
  • Educational institutions, public schools, and organizations involved in cultural or curricular programming if the bill affects curricula or program funding.
  • Individuals and organizations subject to new compliance requirements, reporting mandates, or oversight mechanisms.
  • Potentially affected communities related to national security, civil liberties, or religious freedom depending on the final text.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Introduction and referral: The bill was introduced in the House and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary on August 6, 2026.
  • Committee process: As standard, the Judiciary Committee would review, amend, and vote on a markup. If approved, the bill would move to the full House floor for debate and a vote.
  • Going forward: If passed by the House, the bill would proceed to the Senate (if applicable) for consideration, where it could be subject to further amendments, negotiations, or conference committee actions.
  • Effective dates: Any enacted provisions would specify effective dates, regulatory deadlines, and potential phased-in compliance timelines.

Practical considerations and analysis

  • Scope and balance: The title signals a broad value-based objective, which may implicate multiple policy areas. The specific balance between enforcement, civil liberties, and program funding will determine its perceived impact.
  • Legal and constitutional review: Depending on the provisions, there could be significant interactions with immigration law, civil rights statutes, or regulatory authority, potentially drawing scrutiny or litigation.
  • Implementation challenges: If the bill creates new agency duties or funding streams, effectiveness would depend on appropriation levels, administrative capacity, and interagency coordination.

For a precise, detailed understanding, please provide the full text or a summary of the bill’s sections. The above provides a general framework based on the bill’s title and typical content of similarly titled legislation.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.