WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SCR 1603

Proposing to amend section 1 of article 11 of the constitution of the state of Kansas to value residential real property, commercial and industrial real property and mobile homes personal property based on the fair market value or average fair market value and providing that the legislature may provide by law for the freezing of property tax valuations for owner-occupied residential property of qualifying seniors.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Larry Alley and 17 co-sponsors

Kansas proposes constitutional amendment capping annual property tax valuation increases for real property and mobile homes, potentially reducing local government revenues while providing tax stability for homeowners.

Motion to accede adopted; Sen. Ty Masterson, Sen. Chase Blasi and Sen. Ethan Corson appointed as third conferees
#constitutionalamendments(kansas) #resolutions #taxation
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SCR 1603

Legislative bill overview

SCR 1603 proposes a constitutional amendment to Kansas that would cap annual increases in property tax valuations for real property and mobile homes. The bill has advanced through the legislature and was adopted with a two-thirds majority in February 2025, indicating it is moving toward voter consideration as a constitutional amendment.

Why is this important

Property tax valuations directly affect what homeowners and property owners pay annually in taxes. A constitutional cap on valuation increases could provide tax stability and predictability for property owners, but would also potentially reduce revenue available to local governments, schools, and public services that depend on property tax funding.

Potential points of contention

  • Revenue impact on local services: Capping valuation increases may reduce funding for schools, county services, and municipalities that rely heavily on property tax revenue, potentially requiring service cuts or alternative revenue sources
  • Definition and scope ambiguity: The amendment's specific cap percentage and which property types qualify as "mobile homes" will determine real-world effects; unclear language could lead to litigation
  • Equity concerns: Property owners in appreciating neighborhoods may benefit disproportionately compared to those in stable or declining markets, raising fairness questions about differential tax treatment

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.