WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HJR 186

Proposing a constitutional amendment prohibiting slavery and involuntary servitude.

89th Legislature (2025) Introduced by Alma Allen

Texas constitutional amendment would explicitly prohibit slavery and involuntary servitude, strengthening protections beyond existing federal law and eliminating prison labor constitutional basis.

Referred to State Affairs
#crimes--againstpersons--general(i0170) #criminalprocedure--sentencing&punishment(i0205) #resolutions--constitutionalamendments(i0661)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HJR 186

Legislative bill overview

HJR 186 proposes a constitutional amendment to the Texas Constitution that would explicitly prohibit slavery and involuntary servitude within the state. This is a joint resolution, meaning if passed by both chambers of the Texas Legislature, it would be submitted to Texas voters for approval in a statewide referendum.

Why is this important

Texas's current constitution contains language permitting involuntary servitude as punishment for crime, mirroring similar provisions in other state constitutions and the 13th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. While federal law already prohibits slavery, an explicit state constitutional prohibition would strengthen protections and could signal a formal repudiation of historical language. This affects criminal justice policy and the legal status of incarcerated individuals required to work.

Potential points of contention

  • Criminal labor practices: The amendment would eliminate the constitutional basis for compelling incarcerated people to work without compensation, raising questions about prison labor programs and operational costs
  • Scope of "involuntary servitude": Disagreement over whether the term covers only slavery or extends to mandatory work by incarcerated individuals, potentially impacting correctional system management
  • Federal vs. state action: Some argue federal law already provides adequate protection, making state action redundant, while others contend state constitutional language carries distinct symbolic and legal weight

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.