WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HJR 212

Proposing a constitutional amendment concerning the limitation on the rate of growth in state and local appropriations with the return of over-collected taxpayer money by reducing taxes.

89th Legislature (2025) Introduced by Steve Toth

Texas constitutional amendment proposal limiting state/local spending growth and requiring tax refunds for over-collected revenue, constraining budget flexibility and altering fiscal policy.

Referred to Appropriations
#resolutions--constitutionalamendments(i0661) #statefinances--appropriations(i0746) #taxation--general(i0815) #taxation--property-assessment&collection(i0798) #taxation--property-stateadministration(i0791) #taxation--sales(i0800)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HJR 212

Legislative bill overview

HJR 212 proposes a constitutional amendment that would limit how quickly state and local government spending can grow and would require "over-collected" tax revenues to be returned to taxpayers through tax reductions. This would require voter approval and, if passed, would fundamentally alter how Texas budgets and manages revenue surpluses.

Why is this important

This amendment would structurally constrain government spending growth regardless of population increases, inflation, or economic changes. It directly impacts how much flexibility policymakers have in responding to emergencies, education funding needs, infrastructure demands, or other services—while also affecting tax policy by mandating automatic tax cuts when revenue exceeds projections.

Potential points of contention

  • Spending flexibility during crises: Fixed spending growth limits could prevent adequate emergency response during recessions, natural disasters, or public health emergencies when revenue declines but needs increase
  • Definition of "over-collection": The bill doesn't specify how over-collection is calculated or what circumstances trigger mandatory tax returns, creating potential legal and administrative disputes
  • Impact on public services: Constraining spending growth below inflation and population growth rates could gradually reduce per-capita funding for schools, healthcare, infrastructure, and public safety over time
  • Interaction with existing constitutional restrictions: Texas already has spending caps (Appropriations Limitation Amendment); unclear how this interacts with existing constraints and whether it provides additional restriction

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.