WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

A 102

Prohibits the removal of managed natural landscapes

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Linda Rosenthal

Prohibits removal of managed natural landscapes, protecting conservation and resilience; may constrain land-use changes by owners, developers, and local governments.

REFERRED TO LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · A 102

Summary: Assembly Bill A 102 – Prohibits the removal of managed natural landscapes

Overview

Assembly Bill A 102, introduced January 8, 2025, is currently in the referral stage to the Local Governments committee. The primary sponsor is Linda Rosenthal. The bill’s title indicates a prohibition on the removal of “managed natural landscapes.” A related bill from a prior session is A 10709.

Purpose and intent

  • The stated aim, as reflected in the title, is to prevent the removal of managed natural landscapes.
  • The measure appears intended to conserve or protect landscapes that are actively managed for ecological, aesthetic, or resilience purposes, though the specific definitions and scope are not provided in the summary.

Key provisions (available information)

  • Core prohibition: The bill would prohibit the removal of landscapes characterized as “managed natural landscapes.”
  • Details such as precise definitions of “managed natural landscapes,” exemptions, enforcement mechanisms, penalties, and administrative processes are not included in the information provided here.
  • Full text would specify how “removal” is defined (e.g., destruction, alteration, or disassembly of such landscapes) and who would be subject to the prohibition (private landowners, public entities, developers, etc.).

Who and what would be affected

  • Potentially affected parties include property owners, developers, land managers, and local governments undertaking projects involving natural landscapes that are managed for conservation, resilience, or other purposes.
  • Local governments, as the bill’s reference committee, may face considerations about implementing or enforcing the prohibition in local land-use decisions.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Introduced: January 8, 2025.
  • Status: Referred to the Local Governments committee (listed twice in the actions provided).
  • No further action, hearing dates, or amendments are indicated in the available information.

Related measures and context

  • Related Bill: A 10709 from a prior session. This connection may reflect ongoing interest in landscape protection and local government involvement in land-use decisions.

Potential impacts and considerations

  • Environmental: If enacted, the bill could enhance preservation of certain landscapes and influence biodiversity, ecosystem services, and resilience to climate impacts.
  • Development and planning: Might constrain certain land-use changes and require alternative management approaches or permitting processes.
  • Local governance: Could shift responsibilities to local governments for implementing the prohibition, including policy development, compliance, and enforcement.

Next steps

  • The bill would progress through committee hearings, potential amendments, and floor votes. Readers should monitor updates from the Local Governments committee for further action, proposed revisions, and potential amendments to definitions, scope, and enforcement.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.