WeVote

Bill

Bill

S 6868

Prohibits the installation or replacement of synthetic turf at outdoor athletic fields and facilities owned or operated by municipalities or school districts in the state

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Robert Jackson

Prohibits installing or replacing synthetic turf on outdoor athletic fields and facilities owned or operated by municipalities or school districts in the state.

REFERRED TO ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 6868

Bill Summary: S 6868

Key details at a glance
- Bill Number: S 6868
- Title: Prohibits the installation or replacement of synthetic turf at outdoor athletic fields and facilities owned or operated by municipalities or school districts in the state
- Status: Referred to Environmental Conservation
- Introduced: March 25, 2025
- Primary Sponsor: Robert Jackson
- Related/Companion: A 4021 (companion bill in the Assembly)

Overview and purpose
- The bill would prohibit the installation or replacement of synthetic turf at outdoor athletic fields and facilities that are owned or operated by municipalities or school districts within the state.
- The intent appears to be to restrict new or replaced synthetic turf installations on publicly owned or operated outdoor athletic assets, shifting future procurement choices away from synthetic turf for these facilities.

Key provisions
- Prohibition Scope: The prohibition applies specifically to the installation or replacement of synthetic turf on outdoor athletic fields and related facilities owned or operated by municipalities or school districts in the state.
- Timeframe and enforcement: The summary provided does not specify effective dates, enforcement mechanisms, penalties, or exemptions. Such details would be typically clarified in the bill’s full text and committee amendments.
- Maintenance and other activities: The summary does not indicate whether existing synthetic turf would be affected beyond replacement or new installation, nor does it address maintenance, repairs, or indoor facilities. These aspects would require review of the bill’s language.

Who would be affected
- Municipal governments and school districts that own or operate outdoor athletic fields and facilities in the state.
- Contractors, designers, and vendors engaged in the installation or replacement of synthetic turf for these public entities.
- Potentially, operators of public outdoor sports facilities and athletic programs that rely on synthetic turf environments.

Procedural and timeline aspects
- Introduced on March 25, 2025.
- Referred to the Environmental Conservation Committee (noted twice in the record provided, both on March 25, 2025).
- Companion legislation exists in the Assembly as A 4021, indicating parallel consideration in both chambers.

Potential impacts and considerations
- Public capital planning: If enacted, municipalities and school districts would need to adjust procurement plans for outdoor athletic fields, potentially delaying or displacing projects that would have replaced synthetic turf.
- Environmental and health implications: Proponents may cite environmental or health considerations associated with synthetic turf; opponents may prefer natural grass or other alternatives. The bill itself does not articulate these arguments, but they are common policy debates surrounding turf materials.
- Fiscal effects: Possible changes in long-term maintenance costs and upfront capital expenditures depending on chosen alternatives to synthetic turf.

Notes
- The available summary does not include specific exemptions, definitions, penalties, or lawsuit/implementation timelines. The full text and committee analyses would provide these details.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.