WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

S 3775

Prohibits the inclusion of confidential clauses in contracts entered into for the purchase of services or commodities by the state

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Leroy Comrie

Prohibits confidential or nondisclosure clauses in state contracts for services or commodities, ensuring contract terms are public and boosting procurement transparency.

REFERRED TO PROCUREMENT AND CONTRACTS
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 3775

Summary of Senate Bill S 3775

Overview

S 3775 is a Senate bill introduced on January 29, 2025, that would prohibit the inclusion of confidential clauses in contracts entered into by the state for the purchase of services or commodities. The bill is currently at the committee referral stage.

  • Bill number: S 3775
  • Title/purpose (as stated): Prohibits the inclusion of confidential clauses in contracts entered into for the purchase of services or commodities by the state.
  • Sponsor: Leroy Comrie (primary)
  • Status: Referred to the Senate Procurement and Contracts committee (as of 2025-01-29)

What the bill would do

  • Core prohibition: The bill would bar the inclusion of confidential or nondisclosure-type clauses in contracts that the state enters into for purchasing services or commodities.
  • Scope: Applies to contracts for the purchase of services or commodities by the state. The specific terms, exceptions, and enforcement mechanisms are not provided in the information available here.

Note: The exact text of the bill would define any carve-outs (e.g., protection of trade secrets, handling of proprietary information, or other exemptions) and specify how confidentiality provisions would be treated in practice. Those details are not included in the provided summary.

Who would be affected

  • State agencies and departments: Entities responsible for procuring services or goods would need to adjust contracting practices to remove or avoid confidential clauses.
  • Contractors and vendors: Firms bidding on or entering contracts with the state would face terms that require public accessibility of contract terms rather than confidentiality.
  • Public and stakeholders: The general public could gain greater access to contract terms, promoting transparency and accountability in state procurement.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Introduced: January 29, 2025
  • Committee action: Referred to the Procurement and Contracts committee on the same date.
  • Legislative actions listed: The record shows two identical referrals on 2025-01-29, which may indicate a clerical duplication in the filing.

Related and companion legislation

  • Senate related bills (prior-session): S 5335, S 5587, S 2509
  • Assembly companion: A 6838 (listed as a companion in both entries)

These related measures suggest ongoing interest in procurement transparency and the treatment of confidentiality in state contracts across both chambers and prior sessions.

Potential impact and considerations

  • Transparency and accountability: By prohibiting confidential clauses, contract terms related to pricing, performance requirements, termination, and other material terms may become more accessible to the public.
  • Contracting practices: Agencies would need to revise standard contract templates and negotiation practices to eliminate confidential language.
  • Business considerations: Some vendors may rely on confidentiality for sensitive terms (e.g., pricing tiers, strategic terms, or competitive information). The bill’s impact would depend on any exemptions or balancing provisions the final text includes.
  • Next steps: Monitor for the full bill language to identify any exceptions, enforcement provisions, penalties, effective dates, and applicability to existing contracts.

If you’d like, I can update this summary once the bill text or committee amendments are released, or compare S 3775 to its related bills.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.