WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HJR 185

Prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation

2026 Regular Session Introduced by Ken Jamison

Prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation by enshrining protection in the Missouri Constitution, creating a high-level, voters-approved nondiscrimination standard.

Referred: Emerging Issues(H)
#civilrights #constitutionalamendments
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HJR 185

Summary of HJR 185 (Missouri, 2026)

Purpose and intent

  • HJR 185 is a joint resolution proposed in the Missouri General Assembly.
  • The core aim, as indicated by the title, is to prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. As a joint resolution, it is typically a constitutional amendment or a measure to place a constitutional amendment on the ballot for voter consideration, rather than a statute that directly changes law through the ordinary legislative process.
  • The bill is sponsored with a co-sponsor: Ken Jamison.

Key provisions and changes (as a joint resolution)

  • Prohibition of discrimination: The resolution seeks to affirm or establish in the Missouri Constitution that individuals shall not be discriminated against on the basis of sexual orientation.
  • Constitutional mechanism: If the resolution proceeds and is approved by voters, the basis for nondiscrimination related to sexual orientation would be entrenched in the state constitution, providing a higher legal standard and harder path for any future rollbacks or exceptions via ordinary statute.
  • Scope: While the specific language is not reproduced here, joint resolutions typically address public policy around civil rights and equal treatment in areas such as employment, housing, education, and access to public accommodations—subject to the exact constitutional text adopted.

Who or what would be affected

  • Individuals: Protection against discrimination for sexual orientation in areas governed by constitutional rights (the exact sectors would depend on the final constitutional language and any accompanying interpretive provisions).
  • Public institutions and government actions: Any state actions, laws, or policies that would be interpreted in light of a constitutional prohibition on discrimination based on sexual orientation.
  • Private entities: Depending on the constitutional text and its interpretation, private sector conduct in areas like employment, housing, or services might be affected to the extent currently allowed by constitutional guarantees and subsequent laws.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Introduction and first reading: Introduced and read for the first time on February 10, 2026.
  • Second reading: Read a second time on February 11, 2026.
  • Referral: Referred to the Emerging Issues (H) committee on May 15, 2026. Emerging Issues committees typically consider new or broad policy proposals that may require additional study or debate.
  • Next steps (pending committee action): The committee may hold hearings, propose amendments, and vote to advance the measure to the full House. If passed by the House, it would move to the Senate (and potentially to a conference committee if there are differences) and ultimately to the voters for ratification if it is a true constitutional amendment via joint resolution.

Additional considerations

  • Ballot status: As a joint resolution, its fate depends on the legislature’s approval and voter ratification. If approved by both chambers and signed (or placed on the ballot) for voter decision, it would require statewide voter approval to become a constitutional amendment.
  • Precedent and impact: Prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation at the constitutional level would create a high-level standard that could influence future civil rights developments, public policy, and regulatory interpretations in Missouri.
  • Limitations: The summary above reflects the information provided. The actual text of HJR 185 would determine precise definitions (e.g., what constitutes discrimination, protected settings, permissible exceptions), enforcement mechanisms, and any related public policy provisions.

If you’d like, I can tailor this summary to focus on specific sections once the bill’s full text is available or provide a side-by-side comparison with existing Missouri nondiscrimination provisions.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.