WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HJR 184

Prohibits discrimination on the basis of race

2026 Regular Session Introduced by Doug Clemens and 1 co-sponsor

Prohibits racial discrimination by state actions or policies, potentially guiding constitutional or statutory changes to ensure equal protection across public programs and contract

Referred: Emerging Issues(H)
#civilrights #constitutionalamendments
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HJR 184

Bill Summary: HJR 184 (Missouri, 2026) – Prohibits discrimination on the basis of race

Purpose and intent

  • HJR 184 is a joint resolution introduced in the Missouri House of Representatives that seeks to address discrimination by race. As a joint resolution, it is typically used to express the sentiment or policy position of the General Assembly, or to propose a constitutional amendment or directive to state action, rather than to enact standalone statutes. The specific procedural vehicle (whether it would propose an amendment to the Missouri Constitution or set forth a directive to legislators or state agencies) would become clear in the subsequent engrossment and passage stages.
  • The bill is sponsored with two co-sponsors: Ken Jamison and Doug Clemens.

Key provisions and changes (what the bill would do)

  • The core premise stated in the title is to prohibit discrimination on the basis of race. While the precise mechanisms depend on the bill’s final language, typical forms for such resolutions include:
    • Proposing a constitutional amendment or a directive to ensure state laws, policies, and actions do not discriminate on the basis of race.
    • Reaffirming a commitment to equal protection under the law and prohibiting race-based discrimination in state programs, contracts, or public accommodations, to the extent that the resolution authorizes or directs such action.
  • As a joint resolution, it may establish principles or authorize measures to combat racial discrimination rather than create new standalone penalties or enforcement provisions, which would ordinarily require separate statutes. The exact scope (e.g., definitions of discrimination, enforcement mechanisms, remedies) would be clarified in later legislative steps or amendments.

Who/what would be affected

  • State government and its agencies generally respond to joint resolutions that set policy direction or authorize constitutional amendments. If HJR 184 leads to a constitutional amendment, all state laws and government actions would be interpreted to comply with the prohibition on racial discrimination.
  • Public-sector programs, contracts, and public accommodations could be implicated if the resolution directs adherence to non-discrimination principles in state-funded activities.
  • Any future statutory changes aligned with the resolution would affect individuals and entities interacting with state services, employment, contracting, and procurement.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Referral: The bill was referred to the Emerging Issues committee (H) on May 15, 2026, suggesting it addresses a contemporary or debated topic requiring consideration by lawmakers focused on new or evolving policy questions.
  • Floor actions:
    • Introduced and read the first time on February 10, 2026.
    • Read the second time on February 11, 2026, indicating progression through the standard reading and amendment process.
    • Referred to Emerging Issues (H) on May 15, 2026, for further consideration and potential public input or expert briefing.
  • As a joint resolution, it would typically require passage by both the Missouri House and Senate and, depending on its content, signature by the governor or approval by the electorate (if it proposes a constitutional amendment). If it proposes an amendment, it would usually be placed on the ballot for voter ratification in a future election.

Additional considerations

  • The bill’s impact will hinge on the exact language adopted in later amendments or engrossments, including:
    • Whether it defines “discrimination on the basis of race” in a specific way.
    • The scope of actions covered (state laws, regulatory actions, public contracts, employment, education, etc.).
    • Enforcement provisions, remedies, or penalties (if any), and whether it creates new rights or obligations for individuals, employers, or public entities.
    • The timeline for potential constitutional amendment processes or statutory changes, and any required votes by both chambers or by voters.

If you would like, I can monitor updates on HJR 184 as the bill advances, or provide a comparison with similar racial non-discrimination proposals to contextualize potential implications.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.