WeVote

Bill

Bill

SB 5

Prohibiting the use of funds provided by the United States government for the conduct of elections and election-related activities unless approved by the legislature.

2025-2026 Regular Session

Kansas legislature requires explicit approval before accepting federal election funds, restricting automatic federal grant access to state election administration.

Vetoed by Governor; Returned to Senate on Wednesday, March 26, 2025
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 5

Legislative bill overview

SB 5 requires Kansas to obtain explicit legislative approval before accepting or using any federal funds designated for election administration and election-related activities. The bill effectively gives the state legislature veto power over federal election grants that would normally flow to the state and local election offices.

Why is this important

Elections in the U.S. are jointly funded through federal, state, and local mechanisms. Federal funds typically support voting infrastructure, cybersecurity, equipment upgrades, and administration. This bill could significantly restrict Kansas election officials' access to federal resources, potentially affecting voting systems, poll worker training, and election security measures. The governor's veto and the subsequent legislative override indicate fundamental disagreement about state-federal fiscal relationships in election administration.

Potential points of contention

  • Federalism and election security: Federal funds often support cybersecurity and election infrastructure standards. Blocking access could leave voting systems vulnerable to threats, which federal funds are designed to address.
  • Practical election administration: Election officials operate on tight budgets and timelines. Requiring legislative pre-approval for federal funds could create administrative delays and force localities to choose between unfunded mandates and reduced election services.
  • Political control of elections: Critics argue legislative approval requirements create opportunities for partisan actors to weaponize funding decisions, while supporters contend states should control how federal money is spent within their borders.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.