WeVote

Bill

Bill

HB 1080

prohibiting the sale of condoms and personal lubricant that contain intentionally added per and polyfluoroalkyl substances.

2026 Regular Session Introduced by Christine Seibert and 1 co-sponsor

ND regulates large appraisal management companies that oversee 15+ in-state or 25+ national appraisers, outlining approved services and exemptions.

Refer for Interim Study: MA VV 02/19/2026 HJ 5 P. 3
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 1080

HB 1080 — Summary (North Dakota: Regulation of Appraisal Management Companies)

Status & Sponsorship
- Introduced by the Industry, Business and Labor Committee at the request of the North Dakota Real Estate Appraiser Qualifications and Ethics Board.
- Bill amends and reenacts sections 43‑23.5‑01, 43‑23.5‑07, 43‑23.5‑08, 43‑23.5‑15 and subsection 6 of 43‑23.5‑21 of the North Dakota Century Code.
- Committee report was issued (favorable) and forwarded to calendars (committee action documented May 2025).

Purpose and intent
- Update and clarify the statutory framework for regulating appraisal management companies (AMCs) in North Dakota.
- Provide precise definitions of AMCs, the services they perform, and the parties subject to regulation; and to enumerate specific statutory exemptions.

Key provisions and changes
- Revised definitions (43‑23.5‑01)
- “Appraisal management company” is defined to mean an external third party that oversees a network or panel of more than 15 certified/licensed appraisers in North Dakota or 25 or more nationally in a given year, when authorized by a creditor or secondary-market principal in connection with consumer mortgage transactions on a consumer’s principal dwelling.
- “Appraisal management services” is explicitly defined and enumerated (examples include administering appraiser panels; recruiting/qualifying appraisers; contracting with appraisers; receiving and delivering appraisal orders; managing appraisal workflows; tracking orders; conducting appraisal reviews/quality control; and providing completed appraisals to clients).
- “Appraisal review” is defined as forming and communicating an opinion about the quality of another appraiser’s work (and expressly excludes purely grammatical/typographical checks or non‑opinion completeness checks).
- “Appraiser panel” and “controlling person” (e.g., >10% owners, officers, or individuals with contracting/management authority) are defined.
- “Federally regulated appraisal management company” and “federally related transaction” are clarified.

  • Exemptions (43‑23.5‑07)
    • The chapter will not apply to:
    • An appraisal firm that exclusively employs appraisers on an employee basis (i.e., traditional in‑house appraisal firms).
    • Federally regulated AMCs or financial institutions (or departments/units thereof) regulated by state or federal agencies.
    • A person who contracts with an appraiser and the completed appraisal is signed by both the performing appraiser and the requesting appraiser.
    • AMCs with appraisal panels smaller than the statutory thresholds (fewer than 16 in‑state or 25 nationally in a given year).
    • AMCs that are subsidiaries owned/controlled by financial institutions that already are subject to appraisal independence standards at least as stringent as state (chapter 43‑23.5‑21) or federal Truth in Lending Act standards, when regulated accordingly.

Who is affected
- Primary: appraisal management companies that meet the panel‑size thresholds and perform appraisal management services for consumer mortgage transactions secured by a primary dwelling in North Dakota.
- Also affected: licensed/certified appraisers who participate on AMC panels; controlling persons (owners/officers) of AMCs; the North Dakota Real Estate Appraiser Qualifications and Ethics Board (oversight/implementation).
- Excluded: small AMCs (below thresholds), in‑house appraisal firms, federally regulated AMCs and certain bank subsidiaries.

Procedural / next steps
- The bill was considered in committee, reported favorably, and sent to the legislative calendar for further floor consideration (dates noted in committee report distribution in May 2025).
- If enacted, the bill will modify statutory definitions and exemptions; additional implementing rules or administrative procedures may follow from the Real Estate Appraiser Qualifications and Ethics Board.

Practical implications / notes
- The clear enumeration of activities that constitute “appraisal management services” narrows ambiguity about which entities are AMCs subject to state regulation.
- The numeric thresholds (more than 15 in‑state or 25 nationally) are the primary triggers for AMC coverage; smaller AMCs remain exempt under the text provided.
- By excluding federally regulated AMCs and certain bank subsidiaries, the bill aligns state regulatory reach with entities already regulated at the federal level.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.