Prohibit Surveillance Data to Set Prices and Wages
HB 25-1264 prohibits using surveillance data to set prices and wages, protecting consumers and workers from discrimination and ensuring transparency in automated systems.
HB 25-1264 prohibits using surveillance data to set prices and wages, protecting consumers and workers from discrimination and ensuring transparency in automated systems.
Bill Number: HB 25-1264
Introduced On: February 18, 2025
Status: Postponed Indefinitely by House Committee on Judiciary on April 22, 2025
Prime Sponsors: Rep. Mabrey, Rep. Garcia, Sen. Jodeh, Sen. Weissman
HB 25-1264 aims to prohibit the use of surveillance data for setting individualized prices and wages, addressing concerns about privacy and discrimination in automated decision-making processes. The bill seeks to protect consumers and workers from potential exploitation based on personal data obtained through surveillance.
Prohibition of Surveillance-Based Discrimination: The bill defines and prohibits "surveillance-based price discrimination" and "surveillance-based wage discrimination." This includes using automated decision systems that rely on surveillance data to determine prices for consumers or wages for workers.
Automated Decision Systems: Entities using automated systems for pricing or wage determination must develop and publish procedures to ensure the accuracy and transparency of data used in these systems.
Deceptive Trade Practice: Violations of this prohibition are classified as deceptive trade practices under the Colorado Consumer Protection Act. Individuals harmed by such violations can file civil actions for damages.
Civil Penalties: The bill allows for civil penalties of up to $20,000 for each violation, with additional penalties for repeat offenses. The Attorney General or district attorneys can also initiate civil actions on behalf of the state.
Rulemaking Authority: The Department of Law is tasked with adopting necessary rules to implement the bill and may bring civil actions for violations.
HB 25-1264 represents an effort to regulate the use of surveillance data in economic decision-making, aiming to protect individuals from potential discrimination and ensure transparency in automated systems. However, its indefinite postponement indicates that further discussion and consideration will be necessary before any potential reintroduction or amendment.
Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.
Sign in to ask a question.