WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HJR 25-1030

Products with Forced Labor Components

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Judy Amabile and 89 co-sponsors

Declares policy to curb purchases of goods with forced-labor components, prompting audits, reporting, and supplier vetting by state agencies and contractors.

Signed by the Speaker of the House
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HJR 25-1030

Summary — HJR 25-1030: “Products with Forced Labor Components”

Overview / Purpose

HJR 25-1030, titled "Products with Forced Labor Components," was introduced in the House on April 7, 2025. Based on the title, the resolution addresses goods that contain components produced with forced labor and is intended to express legislative direction, policy, or requirements relating to such products. The exact legal effect depends on the bill’s text (e.g., whether it is a binding restriction, procurement rule, declaration, or memorial to Congress). The bill drew extensive sponsorship, indicating broad interest among legislators.

Status and timeline

  • Introduced in House: April 7, 2025
  • House Third Reading Passed: April 21, 2025 (laid over April 8)
  • Introduced/Assigned in Senate: April 30, 2025 (laid over April 30)
  • Senate Third Reading Passed (no amendments): May 1, 2025
  • Signed by President of the Senate and Speaker of the House: May 6, 2025

Note: The record shows signatures by presiding officers in each chamber. Whether further executive action (e.g., governor signature) is required depends on whether the measure is a binding statute, joint resolution, or a nonbinding legislative statement — consult the bill text or legislative counsel for final legal status.

Key provisions likely addressed (text not provided)

Because the full bill text is not included, the following are commonly addressed elements for legislation with this title. Confirm actual provisions in the official text.
- Definitions: what constitutes “forced labor” and which products/components are covered.
- Prohibitions or restrictions: banning state procurement, contracts, or investments in products with forced-labor components.
- Due diligence and reporting: requirements for vendors and state agencies to audit supply chains and certify absence of forced-labor components.
- Enforcement and remedies: penalties, contract termination, debarment, or reporting to oversight bodies.
- Public transparency: mandatory labeling, disclosures, or a public list of restricted products/suppliers.
- Exceptions or phased implementation: timelines, de minimis thresholds, or waivers for national security/critical supplies.

Who would be affected

  • State agencies and public procurement officers (if the bill targets government contracting).
  • Businesses and vendors that sell to state government or operate in the state supply chain.
  • Manufacturers and upstream suppliers whose components may be subject to screening.
  • Consumers and civil-society groups (through increased transparency and potential changes in product availability).
  • Financial actors if investment or divestment language is included.

Potential impacts

  • Increased compliance costs for vendors (supply-chain audits, certifications).
  • Shifts in procurement and sourcing away from suppliers with forced-labor risk.
  • Greater public transparency and potential reputational consequences for companies.
  • Administrative burden on state agencies to implement monitoring/enforcement.

Next steps / Where to find the full text

To determine the bill’s exact requirements, legal effect, and enforcement mechanisms, consult the official bill text and legislative history on the state legislature’s website or contact the bill sponsors (primary sponsors include Byron Pelton, Jennifer Bacon, Kyle Mullica, and Ty Winter). The official bill document will specify definitions, exceptions, effective dates, and whether further executive approval is required.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.