WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HF 1118

Post-traumatic stress syndrome benefits that law enforcement agencies must provide peace officers revised.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Matt Bliss and 3 co-sponsors

HF 1118 requires Minnesota law enforcement agencies to provide defined PTSD-related benefits and supports to peace officers, with access, standards, and funding implications.

Author added Engen
#insurance-health #mentalhealthandrelatedconditions #policeandpeaceofficers #publicsafetydepartment
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HF 1118

Summary of HF 1118 (2025-2026) — Minnesota

Purpose and intent

HF 1118 aims to revise and clarify the post-traumatic stress syndrome (PTSD) benefits that law enforcement agencies must provide to peace officers. The bill focuses on ensuring certain PTSD-related protections, supports, or benefits are available to officers, and it updates requirements for agencies in relation to trauma exposure and associated needs. The exact language of the bill is not provided here, but the title indicates a reform or expansion of PTSD benefits obligations for agencies employing peace officers.

Key provisions and changes (as inferred from the title)

Because the full text is not provided, the following outlines reflect the likely scope based on the bill’s title and common policy approaches in similar legislation. Readers should refer to the official text for precise provisions.

  • Mandatory PTSD-related benefits: The bill likely requires law enforcement agencies to provide specific PTSD-related benefits and supports to peace officers. This could include access to mental health services, counseling, peer support, or other therapeutic resources.
  • Access and eligibility: Provisions may define which officers are eligible (e.g., sworn peace officers, active-duty personnel) and under what circumstances PTSD benefits must be offered or made available.
  • Agency responsibilities: Agencies may be required to establish procedures for identifying PTSD risk, facilitating timely access to care, maintaining confidential processes, and ensuring reasonable accommodations or time off when needed.
  • Funding and resources: There could be requirements regarding funding mechanisms, such as budget allocations, grants, or state support to cover PTSD-related services and program administration.
  • Standards and compliance: The bill might set standards for the quality and scope of services, reporting requirements, and compliance monitoring for agencies.
  • Definitions and scope: Clear definitions of PTSD, related trauma exposure, and what constitutes “benefits” or “supports” to avoid ambiguity.

Who would be affected

  • Law enforcement agencies in Minnesota that employ peace officers would bear the primary obligations to provide the revised PTSD benefits.
  • Peace officers/law enforcement personnel would be the beneficiaries, gaining access to defined PTSD supports and services.
  • Agency leadership and human resources/employee wellness divisions would be responsible for implementing and administering the required benefits.
  • State and local governments providing funding or oversight could be involved, depending on the final provisions.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Introduced and referred: HF 1118 was introduced and referred to the Public Safety Finance and Policy committee on February 19, 2025.
  • Sponsor activity: The bill lists several co-sponsors, indicating broad bipartisan or cross-field support:
    • Engen (initial author, later listed as co-sponsor)
    • Bidal Duran (co-sponsor)
    • Matt Bliss (co-sponsor)
    • Erica Schwartz (co-sponsor)
    • Elliott Engen (co-sponsor)
  • Next steps: As with most Minnesota House processes, the bill would advance through committee hearings, potential amendments, and votes before moving to the Senate and ultimately the governor for signature. Timelines depend on committee scheduling, amendments, and floor action.

Potential impact and considerations

  • Operational impact: Agencies may need to adjust policies, hire or train mental health staff, and establish confidential pathways for officers to seek help without stigma or administrative barriers.
  • Cost considerations: Depending on funding language, the bill could increase spending on mental health services, staffing, or program administration within public safety budgets.
  • Well-being and retention: By formalizing PTSD supports, the bill could improve officer well-being, job satisfaction, and retention, potentially reducing turnover related to mental health challenges.
  • Implementation challenges: Definitional clarity, ensuring timely access to services, safeguarding confidentiality, and measuring program effectiveness would be key implementation challenges.

Note: This summary is based on the bill title and available action history. For precise provisions, definitions, and fiscal impact, please refer to the official HF 1118 text and committee analysis once released.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.