WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SF 574

Pokegama Bridge trail system safety improvements appropriation

2025-2026 Regular Session

SF 574 lowers public project retention from 5% to 3% and caps contractor-to-subcontractor withholding, boosting cash flow for contractors while protecting funds for claims.

Chief author added Heintzeman
#naturalresourcesandnaturalresourcesdepartment #parksandtrails
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SF 574

Summary — SF 574: Public improvement contracts — fee retention

Status: Enacted (signed by Governor April 25, 2025)
Introduced: March 10, 2025 (multiple committee actions); Passed Senate and House; Companion: HF 781

Main purpose

SF 574 lowers the maximum percentage of contract payments that public owners (public corporations) and contractors may withhold as retention on public improvement construction contracts. The change is intended to reduce the amount of money withheld from contractors and subcontractors during public construction projects.

Key provisions

  • Amends Iowa Code sections 573.12 and 573.13.
  • Reduces the maximum retention rate:
    • From “not more than five percent” to “not more than three percent” of each monthly payment that a public corporation may retain under a public improvement contract (§573.12(1)(a)).
    • Aligns the contractor-to-subcontractor withholding limit to the same maximum: the contractor may retain from payments to a subcontractor the lesser of three percent or the contractually specified amount (§573.12(1)(b)).
  • Confirms retained percentage remains an inviolable fund for payment of claims for materials furnished and labor performed on the improvement, and must be held and disposed of as provided in chapter (amended §573.13).

(Note: amendment S-3048, which was adopted in the legislative process, contains the reduction to three percent and the revised inviolability language that appear in the enrolled bill.)

Who is affected

  • Public corporations (state agencies, cities, counties, school districts, and other governmental entities that contract for public improvements) — they will generally hold less retention on monthly payments.
  • Prime contractors and subcontractors — will have increased cash flow and reduced withheld retention amounts (from up to 5% down to up to 3%), affecting working capital and bonding/credit considerations.
  • Suppliers and laborers — potentially benefit indirectly because a smaller retained fund could improve contractor liquidity to pay downstream parties.
  • Claimants and parties asserting claims against retention funds — the retained fund continues to be designated for payment of legitimate claims.

Procedural timeline / status

  • Introduced March 10, 2025.
  • Amendment S-3048 filed and adopted (March 25); bill passed Senate March 25 (45–4) and House April 15 (90–4).
  • Reported correctly enrolled and sent to Governor April 25, 2025; signed by Governor April 25, 2025 — became law.

Practical implications / considerations

  • Contractors and subcontractors should see modest cash-flow improvement on public projects; the cumulative effect is greater on larger projects.
  • Public owners will retain a smaller buffer (reduced from 5% to 3%) to secure completion and payment of claims; this may increase reliance on surety bonds or other contractual protections.
  • The change does not eliminate the retained fund’s role in satisfying claims — retained amounts remain legally protected for payment of claims for materials and labor.
  • Fiscal impact on public entities is limited to a timing effect on cash retained; agencies should consider whether contract provisions or procurement policies need updating to reflect the new statutory maximum.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.