WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HF 327

Penalty for introducing contraband into a correctional facility increased.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Elliott Engen and 1 co-sponsor

HF 327 raises penalties for knowingly bringing or attempting to bring contraband into correctional facilities, aiming to deter and penalize such offenses.

Introduction and first reading, referred to Public Safety Finance and Policy
#correctionsandcorrectionsdepartment #crimesandcriminals
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HF 327

Summary of HF 327 (2025-2026) – Penalty for Introducing Contraband into a Correctional Facility

Purpose and Intent

HF 327 proposes to increase penalties for introducing contraband into a correctional facility. The bill aims to deter unauthorized items being brought into prisons and jails by tightening the consequences for offenders who attempt to or succeed in delivering contraband to incarcerated individuals or facilities.

Key Provisions and Changes

  • Main Change: Elevates penalties for introducing contraband into a correctional facility.
  • Scope of Prohibition: Applies to individuals who knowingly bring, attempt to bring, or facilitate the introduction of contraband into state or local correctional facilities.
  • Definition of Contraband: Items deemed contraband generally include controlled substances, weapons, tools that could aid in escape, communication devices, or any item prohibited by facility rules. (The bill text would specify exact item categories; the summary reflects typical statutory framing.)
  • Penalty Structure: The bill would set higher fines, longer sentences, or both, relative to existing law for contraband offenses. The precise sentencing ranges and aggravating factors would be defined in the bill’s statutory language.
  • ** aggravating Factors (potential):** Penalties could be enhanced if contraband is introduced in a manner that endangers staff or inmates, involves organized crime, or occurs within specific high-risk facilities or during particular circumstances (e.g., behind a verified security breach).
  • Related Violations: May align with, or create parallel offenses to, introducing contraband to a correctional facility by means of delivery, possession with intent to distribute inside the facility, or furnishing items to inmates.

Who Is Affected

  • Offenders/Individuals: Persons who knowingly bring or attempt to bring contraband into correctional facilities.
  • Potential Defendants: Visitors, family members, staff, or other individuals interacting with correctional environments who may be implicated if found to have introduced or attempted to introduce contraband.
  • Correctional Facilities: State prisons, county jails, and any other facilities under Minnesota corrections oversight where contraband is prohibited.

Procedural and Timeline Aspects

  • Introduced and Readings: The bill was introduced and first read on February 13, 2025, and referred to the Public Safety Finance and Policy committee.
  • Sponsor Information: Co-sponsors include Natalie Zeleznikar and Elliott Engen.
  • Next Steps: If advanced, the bill would proceed through committee hearings, potential amendments, and votes in the House, and then move to the Senate if it progresses in parallel under Minnesota’s bicameral process.

Potential Impact and Considerations

  • Deterrence Effect: Higher penalties may deter attempts to bring contraband into facilities, potentially reducing safety risks to staff and inmates.
  • Custody and Security: Facilities may experience changes in security protocols and enforcement approaches to address amplified penalties.
  • Enforcement and Prosecution: Prosecutors would apply the enhanced penalties where applicable, subject to the bill’s exact statutory language and defined contraband categories.
  • Civil/Administrative Implications: Possible ancillary effects on facility administration, visitor policies, and oversight mechanisms.

This summary reflects the bill’s stated focus on increasing penalties for contraband introduction into correctional facilities and outlines the anticipated areas of impact based on typical legislative drafting. For precise statutory language, consult the official HF 327 text and any amendments adopted during committee review.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.