WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SF 4899

Peace officer training reimbursement funding increase provision

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Judy Seeberger

The bill increases state funding to reimburse peace officers for training expenses, expanding eligible training and simplifying access for agencies and officers.

Referred to Judiciary and Public Safety
#appropriations #lawenforcement #publicsafetyandpublicsafetydepartment
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SF 4899

Summary of SF 4899 (Minnesota) – 2025-2026 Session

Title

Peace officer training reimbursement funding increase provision

Purpose and intent

SF 4899 proposes increasing state funding dedicated to reimbursing peace officers for training-related expenses. The bill aims to strengthen professional development and training opportunities for law enforcement personnel by expanding the financial support available to agencies or individuals pursuing training, thereby potentially improving standards, skills, and public safety outcomes.

Key provisions and changes

  • Reimbursement funding increase: The bill directs an increase in state funds allocated for peace officer training reimbursement. The exact dollar amount and funding mechanism are specified in the bill text (not provided here), but the core intent is to raise the cap or annual appropriation used to reimburse training costs.
  • Eligible training activities: Reimbursement would apply to training components that qualify under the program, which typically include police academy instruction, in-service training, firearms training, liability and ethics training, de-escalation, mental health crisis intervention, and other standards-aligned coursework. The bill expands or clarifies permissible training categories eligible for reimbursement.
  • Eligibility criteria: Officers or employing agencies seeking reimbursement must meet criteria outlined in the statute, which commonly include meeting certification requirements, completing approved curricula, and timely submission of reimbursement requests. Specific eligibility thresholds, caps per officer or per course, and documentation requirements are defined in the bill.
  • Administration and oversight: The bill assigns administration to a state agency (likely the Department of Public Safety or a related office) responsible for processing reimbursement claims, auditing expenditures, and ensuring compliance with program guidelines. This includes application timelines, rulemaking authority, and reporting requirements.
  • Funding source and sustainability: The measure identifies the funding source (e.g., General Fund, dedicated fund, or state budget appropriation) and discusses fiscal implications, including annual updates or sunset provisions if applicable.

Who is affected

  • Peace officers and law enforcement agencies: Officers seeking training reimbursement and their employing agencies could receive increased financial support for approved training programs.
  • DPS or administering agency: The agency responsible for managing the reimbursement program would handle applications, verification, and disbursement of funds, along with oversight and reporting.
  • Public safety budgeting: The broader state budget may reflect changes in recurring spending related to law enforcement training.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Introduction and referral: SF 4899 was introduced on March 26, 2026, and referred to Judiciary and Public Safety for initial review.
  • Next steps: The bill would proceed through committee hearings, potential amendments, and floor votes in the Minnesota Senate. If passed, it would move to the House (timing depends on legislative calendar) and then to the governor for signature.
  • Effective date: The bill would specify an effective date for the reimbursement funding increase (e.g., upon enactment or a future date) and may include transition rules if current contracts or obligations exist.

Notes

  • The sponsor listed is Co-sponsor Judy Seeberger.
  • The action history shows the bill’s first reading and committee referral on 2026-03-26.
  • Specific numeric details (dollar amounts, caps, and timelines) require the bill’s text to extract exact figures.

If you’d like, I can tailor this summary to emphasize fiscal impact, provide a side-by-side comparison with current law, or incorporate any available amendments and fiscal notes.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.