Para ordenar al Senado del Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico, que de conformidad con la Sección 21.5 del Reglamento del Senado de Puerto Rico, se reúna en Comisión Total para realizar una Sesión de Interpelación al director ejecutivo de la Autoridad de Alianzas Público Privadas, Josué Colón Ortiz y a la directora ejecutiva de la Autoridad de Energía Eléctrica, Mary Carmen Zapata Acosta; a los efectos de conocer los detalles del proceso de despeje de vegetación en todo Puerto Rico, incluyendo el desglose por regiones y municipios; así como los trámites y las gestiones realizadas por las entidades gubernamentales para exigirle al consorcio LUMA Energy una respuesta rápida y eficiente sobre el proceso de despeje de vegetación; así como cualquier otra información requerida por los integrantes del Senado del Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico; y para otros fines relacionados.

2025-2028 Session

Senate interpellation demands details on LUMA Energy's vegetation clearing progress and government oversight of Puerto Rico's privatized power utility operations.

Comisión no recomienda aprobación de la medida

Legislative bill overview

Bill RS 278 orders Puerto Rico's Senate to hold a full commission interpellation session with executives from the Public-Private Partnerships Authority and the Electric Power Authority to discuss vegetation clearing operations across Puerto Rico managed by LUMA Energy. The session aims to obtain detailed information about clearing progress by region and municipality, government efforts to ensure LUMA Energy's compliance, and related documents requested by senators.

Why is this important

Vegetation clearing around power lines is critical infrastructure maintenance directly affecting grid reliability and outage prevention in Puerto Rico. This interpellation reflects legislative oversight of LUMA Energy's performance under its privatized management contract, a politically sensitive arrangement that has faced public criticism. The transparency demanded could impact accountability standards for private utility operators and future contract negotiations.

Potential points of contention

LUMA Energy accountability: Whether current clearing efforts are adequate or timely; disputes over responsibility for delays or inefficiencies

Government performance: Questions about whether the Public-Private Partnerships Authority and Electric Power Authority have adequately monitored and enforced contractual obligations

Public access to information: Potential disagreements over what information LUMA Energy must disclose versus proprietary operational details