Para ordenar a la Comisión de Transportación, Telecomunicaciones, Servicios Públicos y Asuntos del Consumidor del Senado de Puerto Rico, a realizar un estudio sobre la figura del “Agente Administrador”, establecida en virtud de la Ley 129-2020, según enmendada, conocida como “Ley de Condominios de Puerto Rico”, con el propósito de constatar que los requisitos dispuestos para ejercer como tal, sean acorde con las funciones que les confiere la antes mencionada Ley 129; así como verificar si el Departamento de Asuntos del Consumidor consistentemente realiza las investigaciones para determinar si el solicitante de una licencia de “Agente Administrador”, cumple con los requisitos para la expedición de la misma, conforme al Reglamento Núm. 9263 de 18 de febrero de 2021, denominado como “REGLAMENTO SOBRE LICENCIA, PERMISO Y REGISTRO DE AGENTES ADMINISTRADORES DE CONDOMINIOS”; y para otros fines relacionados.

2025-2028 Session

Senate orders study of Managing Agent licensing requirements and Department of Consumer Affairs oversight compliance under Puerto Rico's Condominium Law.

Referido a Comisión(es)

Legislative bill overview

Bill RS 239 orders Puerto Rico's Senate Transportation, Telecommunications, Public Services, and Consumer Affairs Commission to conduct a study on the "Administrador Agente" (Managing Agent) role established under Law 129-2020 (Puerto Rico Condominium Law). The study will examine whether the current requirements to serve as a Managing Agent align with the substantial responsibilities the law assigns to them, and whether the Department of Consumer Affairs properly investigates applicants' qualifications according to Regulation 9263.

Why is this important

Managing Agents oversee critical condominium operations affecting thousands of Puerto Rico property owners and residents. If requirements are insufficient or oversight inadequate, this could result in incompetent or unethical management, leading to financial mismanagement, regulatory violations, and disputes among residents. The study could inform reforms to protect consumer interests in residential communities.

Potential points of contention

Regulatory burden vs. professional quality: Stricter requirements may increase licensing costs and reduce the pool of available managers, potentially raising management fees for residents

Department resource allocation: The study implicitly questions Department of Consumer Affairs' enforcement capacity; if findings show inadequate investigations, this reveals budget/staffing issues requiring additional funding

Grandfathering vs. retroactive standards: Any new requirements may create conflict over whether existing licensed agents should meet higher standards or be grandfathered under current rules