WeVote

Bill

Bill

PC 639

Para enmendar los artículos 3, 49 y 51 de la Ley Núm. 129-2020, conocida como la “Ley de Condominios de Puerto Rico”, a los fines de realizar enmiendas técnicas a Ley, de permitir que residentes bona fide no titulares, o familiares que convivan o no hasta segundo grado de consanguinidad o personas relacionadas por afinidad, autorizados por los titulares, puedan representar al titula, con voz y voto en las asambleas de titulares y ser elegibles para formar parte de la Junta de Directores ocupando un puesto de vocal; establecer requisitos para su participación; y para otros fines relacionados.

2025-2028 Session

Bill PC 639 allows authorized non-owner residents and relatives to represent condo owners with voting rights and Board eligibility in Puerto Rico condominium assemblies, expanding participation beyond titled owners.

Remitido a Comisión de Calendarios de la Cámara
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · PC 639

Legislative bill overview

Bill PC 639 amends Puerto Rico's 2020 Condominium Law to allow authorized non-owner residents and family members (up to second-degree relatives by blood or marriage) to represent property owners at condominium assembly meetings with voting rights and eligibility to serve on the Board of Directors. The bill establishes technical amendments and participation requirements for these representatives.

Why is this important

This change could significantly affect condominium governance by expanding who can participate in decision-making beyond titled owners, potentially addressing situations where owners are absent, elderly, or unable to participate. However, it fundamentally alters the ownership-based voting structure that has traditionally governed condominium associations in Puerto Rico, raising questions about accountability and property rights protections.

Potential points of contention

  • Ownership vs. representation: Allowing non-owners to vote and hold board positions dilutes the principle that only property owners should control condominium decisions, potentially creating conflicts between tenant representatives and owner interests
  • Conflict of interest risks: Family members or residents authorized by owners could have divergent interests, lack fiduciary accountability, or face pressure from multiple stakeholders without clear legal liability protections
  • Vague eligibility criteria: The bill's requirements for participation, authorization verification, and removal of representatives are not detailed in the summary, leaving potential enforcement and dispute-resolution issues undefined

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.