WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

PC 1053

Para crear la "Ley de Protección y Transparencia en el Otorgamiento de Becas Deportivas a Menores de Edad", a los fines de establecer los requisitos mínimos en los contratos de becas deportivas ofrecidos por instituciones privadas, clubes, academias y agentes a menores de edad en Puerto Rico; prohibir cláusulas abusivas que comprometan el futuro económico del menor; garantizar la prioridad de la educación; establecer la jurisdicción del Departamento de Recreación y Deportes; y para otros fines relacionados.

2025-2028 Session

Puerto Rico law regulating sports scholarship contracts for minors, prohibiting exploitative clauses and ensuring education priority, under Department of Recreation and Sports oversight.

Remitido a la Comisión de Reglas y Calendario del Senado
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · PC 1053

Legislative bill overview

PC 1053 creates a "Law for Protection and Transparency in Granting Sports Scholarships to Minors," establishing minimum contract requirements for sports scholarships offered by private institutions, clubs, academies, and agents to minors in Puerto Rico. The bill prohibits abusive contract clauses that compromise a minor's economic future, prioritizes education over sports obligations, and grants regulatory authority to the Department of Recreation and Sports.

Why is this important

Young athletes are vulnerable to exploitative contracts that can jeopardize their financial security and educational development. This legislation addresses real cases where minors sign agreements with unfavorable terms, excessive financial commitments, or clauses that prioritize athletic performance over schooling—issues that disproportionately affect economically disadvantaged families seeking educational pathways through sports.

Potential points of contention

  • Regulatory scope and enforcement: Determining which entities fall under jurisdiction and how the Department of Recreation and Sports will monitor and penalize violations across private institutions may face implementation challenges
  • Contract freedom vs. protection: Private institutions and agents may argue that detailed government regulation of contracts restricts business flexibility and contractual freedom between willing parties
  • Definition of "abusive clauses": Disagreement over what constitutes prohibited language (financial penalties, performance requirements, image rights) could create ambiguity in compliance and litigation risk

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.