WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

PC 256

Para añadir un nuevo subinciso (E) al inciso (a) de la Sección 3.1 y enmendar las secciones 3.2 y 3.3 de la Ley 38–2017, según enmendada, denominada “Ley de Procedimiento Administrativo Uniforme del Gobierno de Puerto Rico”; con el fin de garantizar una mayor transparencia e imparcialidad en los procedimientos administrativos; y para decretar otras disposiciones complementarias.

2025-2028 Session

Bill PC 256 amends Puerto Rico's administrative procedure law to strengthen transparency and impartiality requirements in government agency decision-making processes.

Referido a Comisión(es)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · PC 256

Legislative bill overview

Bill PC 256 proposes amendments to Puerto Rico's Uniform Administrative Procedure Law (Law 38-2017) by adding a new subsection (E) to Section 3.1(a) and modifying Sections 3.2 and 3.3. The bill aims to enhance transparency and impartiality in administrative procedures across government agencies.

Why is this important

Administrative procedures directly affect how Puerto Rico's government agencies make decisions affecting citizens, businesses, and organizations. Strengthening transparency and impartiality requirements can reduce corruption, improve public trust, and ensure fairer treatment in licensing, permitting, and regulatory processes. These procedural safeguards serve as foundational protections for due process rights.

Potential points of contention

  • Implementation costs: Enhanced transparency and impartiality measures may require agencies to invest in new systems, training, or personnel, potentially increasing government operational expenses
  • Procedural efficiency concerns: Additional procedural requirements could slow administrative decision-making, creating delays in permits, licenses, and regulatory approvals that businesses and citizens depend on
  • Vague amendment language: The bill's specific provisions (new subsection E and modifications to 3.2-3.3) are not detailed in available information, making it unclear whether changes are substantive or technical, and whether stakeholders adequately understand the full scope

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.