WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HJR 1032

Notify Governor of Adjournment

2026 Regular Session

Requires notifying the Governor when the Colorado General Assembly adjourns to improve executive awareness and coordination.

Senate Third Reading Lay on the Table-Deemed Lost - No Amendments
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HJR 1032

Bill Overview

House Joint Resolution 1032 (HJR 1032), introduced in the 2026 Session (Colorado, 2026A), seeks to modify procedural norms around legislative adjournment by requiring notification to the Governor when the General Assembly adjourns.

Purpose and Intent

  • The primary purpose is to establish a formal requirement for informing the Governor of the timing and occurrence of adjournment.
  • The resolution aims to enhance executive-legislative coordination by ensuring the Governor is promptly aware of adjournment actions, potentially affecting the Governor’s ability to call special sessions, manage intergovernmental relations, or address pending legislative matters.

Key Provisions

  • Notification Requirement: The bill mandates that the Governor be notified when the Colorado General Assembly adjourns.
  • Timing and Method (Implied by typical HJR structure): While the exact procedural details are not provided in the summary, such resolutions typically specify that notification occur promptly after adjournment and may outline acceptable methods of notice (e.g., official communication from the presiding officers or the Secretary of State’s office).
  • Scope of Adjournment: The resolution likely covers adjournment of either or both chambers, potentially addressing concurrent or sine die adjournment, and may define “adjournment” for purposes of the notice requirement.

Who Is Affected

  • Executive Branch: Governor and Governor’s Office would be the primary recipient of the notification.
  • Legislative Branch: State legislators and legislative leadership who oversee adjournment proceedings would implement the notification process.
  • Administrative/Legal Staff: Officials responsible for official communications and records related to adjournment (e.g., clerks, secretary of state, chamber presidents) would play a role in compliance and dissemination.

Procedural and Timeline Considerations

  • Status: Introduced and assigned to committee in the House (as of 2026-05-12).
  • Next Steps: Typically, the proposal would be considered by a House committee (often named to handle constitutional or procedural matters), followed by potential floor action in the House and possibly the Senate, depending on bill progression.
  • Effective Date: As a Joint Resolution concerning procedure, it may become effective upon enactment or upon adoption, with any required transition language specified in the text.
  • Constitutional/Legal Implications: The resolution would not create new law but would modify procedural practices and formalities surrounding adjournment communications.

Potential Impact

  • Positive: Improves transparency and executive awareness of adjournment timing, potentially aiding the Governor in planning special sessions or addressing time-sensitive matters.
  • Administrative Burden: Introduces an additional formal communication step for legislative leadership and staff.
  • Political Considerations: If the Governor’s request or preferences regarding adjournment notifications are relevant, this resolution could influence interbranch coordination dynamics.

Notes

  • The available information is limited to the bill’s title, session, jurisdiction, and initial action history. Full text would clarify the exact language, definitions (e.g., what constitutes “adjournment”), and any specific timelines or exceptions.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.