WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 6165

Natural resources: sand dunes; regulation of critical dune development; revise. Amends secs. 35301, 35302, 35303, 35304, 35305, 35306, 35308, 35309, 35310, 35311, 35312, 35313, 35314, 35315, 35316, 35319, 35321, 35323 & 35324 of 1994 PA 451 (MCL 324.35301 et seq.); adds secs. 35304b & 35326 & repeals secs. 35307, 35311a, 35311b, 35317, 35320, 35322 & 35325 of 1994 PA 451 (MCL 324.35307 et seq.).

2023-2024 Regular Session Introduced by Brenda Carter and 8 co-sponsors

Michigan HB 6165 overhauls sand dune development regulations by restructuring permitting standards and environmental protections for critical coastal dune areas.

bill electronically reproduced 11/26/2024
#naturalresources:sanddunes
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 6165

Legislative bill overview

HB 6165 comprehensively revises Michigan's sand dune protection and development regulations under the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act. The bill restructures permitting requirements, environmental standards, and oversight mechanisms for construction and activities in critical dune areas along Michigan's coastlines.

Why is this important

Sand dunes provide crucial coastal protection, prevent erosion, support unique ecosystems, and have significant recreational and economic value. How Michigan regulates dune development directly affects property rights, environmental preservation, tourism, and coastal community resilience—particularly as climate change increases storm surge and erosion risks.

Potential points of contention

  • Property rights vs. environmental protection: Revisions to permitting standards could either strengthen restrictions on landowner development rights or streamline approval processes, depending on implementation details not visible in the bill summary
  • Regulatory clarity and burden: Repealing seven existing sections while adding new ones creates uncertainty about whether compliance will become simpler or more complex for developers and property owners
  • Stakeholder balance: The extensive amendments suggest significant shifts in how environmental review, agency authority, or public interest considerations are weighted between conservation groups, property owners, and local governments

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.