Bill
HB 1628
HB1628 varies by state; the Mississippi bill title not present in your documents.
Summary note — mismatch in materials
- The materials you provided for "HB 1628" include several different bills from different states and on different subjects, not the titled "MS Student Funding Formula" bill. I did not find text about Mississippi student funding in the documents. Below I summarize the distinct HB 1628 documents that appear in your upload (Illinois, Arkansas, and Indiana). If you intended a specific "MS Student Funding Formula" bill, please upload or paste that text and I will summarize it.
1) Illinois — HB1628 (Seizure and Forfeiture Reporting Act amendments) — Enacted as Public Act 104-0194
- Purpose / intent: Increase transparency and standardized reporting of property seizures and forfeitures by law enforcement across Illinois; create public, machine-readable reporting and aggregated statewide summaries.
- Key provisions:
- Amends 5 ILCS 810/10 to require law enforcement agencies that seize, forfeit, or receive forfeiture property to report specified data to the Illinois State Police (ISP) within 60 days after December 31 of the year in which the seizure/forfeiture occurred.
- Required seizure data includes agency name, seizure date, property type and description (including make/model/year and VIN/serial for conveyances), location (county/municipality/zip or specific location), and the accused person’s race, sex, age, and residential zip code (self‑reported).
- Requires prosecuting authorities to report police report numbers, forfeiture case numbers and venues, criminal case numbers, and certain court-record outcomes (e.g., claims filed, innocent owner motions, outcomes, date of final order).
- Agencies that did not seize/forfeit/receive/spend forfeiture funds must file a null report.
- ISP must maintain a public, searchable database with annual aggregate data per reporting agency (machine-readable) and must publish an annual statewide summary report (including categorized accounting of proceeds and expenditures).
- Implementation deadline referenced: ISP to establish/implement requirements on or before January 1, 2026 (various versions), and enacted as Public Act 104-0194 with effective date January 1, 2026.
- Who is affected: state and local law enforcement agencies, drug task forces/MEGs, prosecuting authorities (State’s Attorneys and Attorney General), the Illinois State Police (as data aggregator), courts, and the public.
- Procedural/timeline: Passed both chambers and enrolled; became Public Act 104-0194, Governor approved, effective Jan 1, 2026.
2) Arkansas — HB1628 (extended post‑conviction no contact order) — introduced version
- Purpose / intent: Expand the list of convictions that permit a court to issue an extended post‑conviction no contact order.
- Key provision:
- Amends Ark. Code § 5-4-106(b) to add "sexual assault in the second degree" (§ 5-14-125) to the enumerated offenses for which a court, at the prosecuting attorney’s request, shall determine whether to issue an extended post‑conviction no contact order. Existing listed offenses include murder, rape, sexual assault in the first degree, kidnapping, certain batteries, domestic battering, and aggravated assault on officers.
- Who is affected: defendants convicted of specified violent and sexual offenses in Arkansas, victims seeking protective post‑conviction orders, prosecutors, and courts.
- Procedural: The bill text shows sponsor names (Rep. Gazaway; Sen. Gilmore) and amendment language; status on your materials: introduced and referred to Judiciary Committee in Arkansas (dates given). (No final status included in your excerpt.)
3) Indiana — HB1628 (local government / infrastructure siting) — introduced version
- Purpose / intent: Centralize and streamline state regulation for siting and deployment of major multi‑jurisdictional utility infrastructure; preempt local regulation for large projects crossing county lines.
- Key provisions (new IC 8-1-1.7):
- Defines "multi‑jurisdictional infrastructure project" (projects involving siting/construction/deployment of generation, transmission, distribution, or storage of electricity, gases/fluids, or water that affect residents/businesses/political subdivisions in more than one county).
- Designates the state (via the relevant state agencies/commission) as the sole regulator for siting and construction of certain large electric generation facilities (e.g., >= 50 MW) and related transmission/distribution/storage infrastructure to the extent not preempted by federal law.
- Preempts political subdivisions from regulating these aspects of such projects and limits local permitting/zoning control for covered projects.
- Includes additional procedural and land‑use timeline provisions (e.g., plat review/timelines, permit review deadlines) in the broader introduced digest.
- Who is affected: project developers, utilities, state regulatory agencies (Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission), political subdivisions/local authorities, and local permitting processes.
- Procedural/timeline: Introduced and referred to Utilities, Energy and Telecommunications Committee; effective date cited for some provisions: July 1, 2025 (if enacted).
Next steps / request
- Tell me which HB1628 (state and topic) you want a focused, single-bill summary for. If you meant the "MS Student Funding Formula" bill referenced in your initial Bill Information, please provide the bill text or a link and I will prepare a concise, 200–500 word summary that covers purpose, main changes, affected parties, and timeline.
Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.
Sign in to ask a question.
