Bill
HB 1853
Arkansas: clarifies that licensees owe primary fidelity to clients, but dual agency with consent can contractually narrow this duty and limited confidentiality.
Note on source materials
- The documents provided contain multiple, inconsistent versions of a bill labeled “HB 1853” from different jurisdictions and on different subjects (Arkansas real‑estate agency law and Illinois higher‑education tax/charity program). The header metadata (title about transportation) does not match the texts. Below is a clear, separate summary of the two substantive texts included and a brief note on the mixed procedural history. Please verify the correct jurisdiction and official bill text before relying on this summary for legal or policy decisions.
Purpose
- To clarify and codify agency duties for real‑estate licensees, and to specify how dual agency may modify certain duties (particularly fidelity/confidentiality).
Key provisions
- Reaffirms that Arkansas common‑law agency principles govern the licensee‑client relationship, supplemented by the statute.
- Establishes that a licensee owes a primary duty of “absolute fidelity” to protect and promote the client’s interests when accepted for employment.
- Creates an explicit carve‑out: when multiple clients consent to dual agency, they may contractually waive the licensee’s primary duty of absolute fidelity.
- Lists licensee duties (non‑exhaustive), including: reasonable effort to further client interests, reasonable skill and care, performance of written agency agreement, following lawful instructions, complying with laws/rules, disclosing non‑confidential material facts, advising clients to seek expert advice on material matters, timely accounting for client funds.
- Confidentiality: licensees must keep confidential information secret, but authorized dual agency may allow limited contractual disclosure of certain confidential information (except where required by law or expressly authorized in writing by the client).
- States that duties are generally nonwaivable, except as provided for consenting dual agency and the limited confidentiality exception.
Who is affected
- Real‑estate licensees, buyers and sellers, and parties involved in dual agency relationships in Arkansas.
Potential impact
- Clarifies legal basis for dual agency and allows parties to contractually narrow fidelity/confidentiality obligations, which may increase permissible disclosure in some dual‑agency transactions while requiring informed client consent. May affect professional practice, client counseling, and regulatory enforcement.
Purpose
- To establish a fund and scholarship program administered by the State Treasurer to expand access to higher education and to create a state income tax credit to incentivize donations to the fund.
Key provisions
- State Treasurer establishes and administers the Invest in Illinois Higher Education Program and the Invest in Illinois Higher Education Fund (special fund in the State treasury).
- Fund receives donations/gifts/grants; moneys used to award scholarships to eligible students.
- Definition of “eligible student”: household federal adjusted gross income (AGI) at or below 300% of federal poverty guidelines in the year before first scholarship receipt; for subsequent years eligible up to 400% of federal poverty guidelines.
- “Scholarship” covers necessary costs and fixed fees (tuition and required per‑period fees) at Illinois community colleges or public universities; excludes certain one‑time refundable deposits.
- Illinois income tax credit (35 ILCS 5/252 new): taxpayers may claim a credit equal to donations made to the fund for taxable years ending on or after Dec. 31, 2025.
- Pass‑through entities: credits allocated consistent with partners/shareholders’ income determinations.
- Credits cannot reduce tax liability below zero; excess may be carried forward up to 5 years.
- Fund creation included in the State Finance Act. Effective upon becoming law.
Who is affected
- State Treasurer’s office (administration), low‑ and moderate‑income students (potential scholarship recipients), donors/taxpayers (eligible for credits), public colleges/universities, and state tax revenues.
Potential impact
- Encourages private donations via a dollar‑for‑dollar state tax credit, likely increasing scholarship dollars available to low‑ and moderate‑income students but reducing state income tax receipts to the extent donations generate credits. Exact fiscal impact depends on donation levels and program uptake.
If you tell me which state/jurisdiction or which text you want a focused summary on (Arkansas real‑estate changes or Illinois higher‑education program), I will produce a tailored one‑page summary with impacts and recommended follow‑ups.
Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.
Sign in to ask a question.
