SB 1064 - Under this act, the state's laws shall preempt any local laws, ordinances, orders, rules, or regulations enacted by a county, municipality, or other political subdivision of the state regulating the sale of tobacco products, alternative nicotine products, or vapor products. Additionally, nothing in this act shall be construed to prohibit counties, municipalities, and other political subdivisions from enforcing ordinances and regulations that prevent the sale of tobacco products, alternative nicotine products, or vapor products to persons under the age of 21. Finally, the provisions of this act shall not be construed to preempt any local laws, ordinances, orders, rules, or regulations relating to tobacco products, alternative nicotine products, or vapor products enacted by a county, municipality, or other political subdivision in effect as of January 1, 2026. This act is substantially similar to SCS/SB 231 (2025) and similar to HCS/HB 344 (2025), SB 911 (2024), SB 522 (2023), HCS/HB 1039 (2023), and SB 1158 (2022). SARAH HASKINS

2026 Regular Session Introduced by Ben Brown

SB 1064 modifies Missouri's tobacco product regulations, affecting retailer compliance, consumer access, and state health policy, though specific changes require full bill text review.

Informal Calendar S Bills for Perfection

Legislative bill overview

SB 1064 modifies existing Missouri state regulations governing tobacco products, though the specific regulatory changes are not detailed in the available information. The bill was prefiled in December 2025 and is sponsored by Senator Ben Brown. Without access to the full bill text, the precise nature of these modifications cannot be determined.

Why is this important

Tobacco regulations significantly affect public health outcomes, business operations, and state revenue. Changes to these provisions can impact youth access to tobacco, flavor restrictions, packaging requirements, taxation, or retailer licensing—each with substantial consequences for health agencies, tobacco retailers, and consumers.

Potential points of contention

Public health vs. business interests: Stricter regulations may reduce youth smoking but burden retailers, while looser regulations prioritize business freedom but raise health concerns

Flavored product restrictions: Any flavor bans face opposition from retailers and adult users while being supported by youth health advocates

Revenue implications: Changes to tax structures or regulatory fees affect state budgets and small businesses differently