SB 1107 - This act provides that no person shall receive compensation for advising or assisting, or referring to another person for such purposes, any individual with regard to any veterans benefits matter, as described in the act, unless such individual provides a written agreement containing the terms of the fees, provides certain disclosures, and complies with requirements under federal law. Additionally, no person shall advertise for such services without including a disclosure as specified in the act. Furthermore, no person shall receive compensation for any services rendered before the date on which a notice of disagreement is filed with the United States Department of Veterans Affairs and no person shall guarantee the receipt of specific veteran benefits. Any person who violates this act shall be guilty of a class A misdemeanor. This act is identical to SB 300 (2025), SB 1405 (2024), is substantially similar to HB 399 (2025), and is similar to a provision in HB 80 (2025), SB 316 (2025), HB 1102 (2025), and in HCS/HB 1490 (2024). KATIE O'BRIEN

2026 Regular Session

SB 1107 regulates compensation rates for non-attorney veterans benefits advisors in Missouri to protect veterans from excessive fees while maintaining service availability.

Hearing Conducted S Veterans and Military Affairs Committee

Legislative bill overview

SB 1107 modifies Missouri's regulations governing compensation for individuals who assist or advise veterans in obtaining benefits. The bill addresses how much money non-attorney professionals can charge veterans for benefits consultation services. This appears to be a consumer protection measure aimed at regulating the veteran benefits assistance industry.

Why is this important

Veterans navigating complex federal and state benefits systems often turn to professional advisors, and unregulated compensation structures can leave vulnerable populations susceptible to exploitation. Clear compensation rules protect veterans from predatory pricing while ensuring legitimate benefit consultants can operate sustainably. The distinction between attorney and non-attorney representatives also affects access to affordable benefits guidance.

Potential points of contention

Fee regulation scope: Whether capping or controlling non-attorney compensation might reduce available services or discourage qualified professionals from assisting veterans

Attorney vs. non-attorney distinction: How the bill treats different categories of representatives and whether differential fee structures are equitable

Enforcement mechanisms: How Missouri will monitor compliance and what penalties exist for violations, and whether enforcement resources are adequate