WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HF 1622

Minnesota Made Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Alternative grant funding provided, and money appropriated.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Paul Anderson and 1 co-sponsor

Establishes Minnesota Made PFAS Alternative grants to fund manufacturers' switch from PFAS, reducing exposure and environmental risks while supporting local jobs.

Introduction and first reading, referred to Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy
#employmentandeconomicdevelopmentdepartment
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HF 1622

Summary of HF 1622 (Minnesota Made PFAS Alternative Grant Funding Provided, and Money Appropriated)

Overview

HF 1622 is a House file introduced on February 27, 2025 and referred to the Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy committee. The bill’s title indicates that it would provide grant funding to support alternatives to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in Minnesota-made products, and that money would be appropriated for this purpose. A Senate companion is SF 304.

Purpose and intent

  • The bill aims to facilitate use of PFAS alternatives in Minnesota-made products and processes, supporting manufacturers in transitioning away from PFAS-containing materials where feasible.
  • By allocating grant funding, the measure seeks to promote safer materials, potentially improve environmental and public health outcomes, and support continued manufacturing activity in Minnesota.

Key provisions and changes (as reflected by the bill’s title and status)

  • Establishment of a PFAS alternatives grant program ( Minnesota Made PFAS Alternative grants) designed to assist eligible entities.
  • Authorization to appropriate funds specifically for these grants (the exact funding amount and structure would be specified in the bill’s text).
  • Likely delegation of administration to the Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) or a related state agency, consistent with the bill’s subject area (Employment and Economic Development Department).
  • Provisions typically associated with grant programs—such as eligibility criteria, application process, grant terms, allowable expenses, reporting requirements, and program oversight—would be defined in the bill. The exact details (e.g., who qualifies, grant caps, matching requirements) would be specified in the official text.
  • Possible requirements for program evaluation, milestones, and annual reporting to the Legislature on grant outcomes and PFAS-use reductions.

Who would be affected

  • Minnesota-based manufacturers and other Minnesota Made program participants seeking to substitute PFAS-containing components or processes with safer alternatives.
  • The Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) or whichever state agency administers the program.
  • Suppliers and service providers involved in PFAS alternatives and related compliance activities.
  • The broader environmental health landscape, through potential reductions in PFAS use and exposure.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Status: Introduction and first reading; the bill has been referred to the Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy committee for consideration.
  • The exact appropriation amount, program specifics, and implementation timeline will be determined by the bill’s text and any amended language during committee deliberations.
  • Relationship to companion: SF 304 (Senate companion) exists, which may receive parallel consideration.

Notes

  • No specific dollar amounts or detailed program criteria are provided in the available information. The definitive provisions, including eligibility, grant size, and reporting requirements, will be set forth in the full bill text.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.