WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SF 543

Minnesota Family Resiliency Partnership funding increase and reallocation of fee revenue

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Karin Housley and 3 co-sponsors

The bill allows flexible Monday/Tuesday canvass timing, adds statewide recount authority for the state elections commissioner, and streamlines multi‑county canvass procedures.

Author added Limmer
#courts #minnesotamanagementandbudgetdepartment
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SF 543

Summary — SF 543 (Amendment S‑3093)

Title on file: Minnesota Family Resiliency Partnership funding increase and reallocation of fee revenue

Note up front: Amendment S‑3093 substantially replaces the bill’s original content. The amendment conforms SF 543 to provisions in HF 928 and contains changes to Minnesota election canvass and recount procedures. (The bill’s original title does not reflect the substituted election‑law content.)

Purpose / intent

The amendment revises statutory deadlines and procedures for canvassing election returns, reconvening special precinct boards, scheduling second canvasses for multi‑county city/school elections, and for ordering recounts — including a new role for the state commissioner of elections in ordering certain statewide or legislative/federal recounts. It makes technical and procedural changes to conform SF 543 to HF 928.

Key provisions (by subject)

  • Canvass day flexibility

    • Changes multiple statutes to require county boards, boards of supervisors, and other canvass bodies to meet and canvass “on the Monday or Tuesday following” an election (replacing references to “the Monday following”).
    • Applies to primary and general canvasses, certification of judicial retention votes, and second canvasses for multi‑county city/school elections.

  • Special precinct reconvening (Section 50.21)

    • Requires the commissioner to reconvene special precinct election boards not earlier than noon on the second day following elections that are to be canvassed on the Monday or Tuesday following the election (with holiday contingencies retained).

  • Second canvass for multi‑county cities and school districts (Section 50.24)

    • The controlling commissioner must conduct the second canvass on the second Monday or Tuesday after the election (or within two business days following recount conclusion, if a recount was requested).
    • Requires transmission of abstracts and individual write‑in tallies; combined city/school abstracts must report vote totals per candidate and on measures, and group write‑in candidates under “scattering” if each received under 5%.

  • Recount procedures (Section 50.48)

    • Retains existing county recount request rule (a written request by 5:00 p.m. on the third day following the county canvass when the margin is less than the statutory threshold — generally the lesser of 1% or 50 votes).
    • Adds a new paragraph authorizing the state commissioner of elections to order recounts for elections for statewide offices, members of the Legislature, or federal offices. Under the new text, the state commissioner shall order a precinct‑by‑precinct recount when a written recount request is filed no later than 5:00 p.m. on the day following the county board’s canvass and the abstracts show the margin is within the statutory threshold (text truncated in available copy but follows the same margin criteria).

  • Miscellaneous

    • Section 43.56, subsection 2 is stricken (the text of that subsection is not included in the summary copy).
    • Section 46.24 (judge/clerk retention): clarifies that judges/clerks must receive more affirmative than negative votes to be retained and requires county boards to canvass on Monday or Tuesday and promptly certify retention vote totals to the state commissioner of elections.

Who is affected

  • County boards of canvassers and boards of supervisors
  • County and state commissioners of elections (new authority for state commissioner in some recounts)
  • City and school district election officials (controlling commissioners in multi‑county contests)
  • Election judges and special precinct boards
  • Candidates for statewide, legislative, and federal office, and voters (timing and mechanics of recounts and canvasses)

Procedural / timeline notes

  • Amendment S‑3093 was filed 2025‑04‑09 and adopted 2025‑04‑14. On 2025‑04‑14 HF 928 was substituted and the bill was later shown as withdrawn. The amendment text indicates SF 543 was conformed to HF 928.
  • Companion bill: HF 1021.
  • Sponsor/author activity: introduced 2025‑03‑06; author Limmer added 2025‑02‑24; referred to Judiciary and Public Safety.

Potential impacts

  • Provides flexibility in canvass scheduling (Monday or Tuesday), which may ease administrative scheduling pressures for counties.
  • Creates statewide executive role (state commissioner of elections) in ordering recounts for higher‑office contests, which alters the locus of authority for initiating statewide/legislative/federal recounts and may affect recount timing and uniformity across precincts.
  • Clarifies coordination and timing for multi‑county canvasses and interactions between recounts and second canvasses.

If you want, I can produce a side‑by‑side comparison of the specific statutory text changes or extract and summarize any omitted/truncated portions if a fuller bill text is provided.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.