WeVote
Log In

Bill

WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HF 2283

Summary: Minnesota Fair Chance Access to Housing Act (HF 2283)

Overview

HF 2283, introduced in the Minnesota 2025-2026 legislative session, establishes a state-level Fair Chance Access to Housing Act. The bill aims to promote non-discriminatory access to housing by limiting criminal history inquiries and the use of criminal records in certain housing-related decisions, with specified penalties for non-compliance.

  • Session/Jurisdiction: Minnesota, 2025-2026
  • Title: Minnesota Fair Chance Access to Housing Act established, and penalties imposed
  • Author/Introducers: Initially introduced with Feist; co-sponsored by Cedrick Frazier and Sandra Feist
  • Action History:
    • 2025-03-13: Introduction and first reading; referred to Housing Finance and Policy
    • 2025-03-27: Author added Feist
  • Primary Objective: To reduce barriers to housing for individuals with criminal records and to ensure fairer access to rental housing and related housing services.

Key Provisions and Changes

While the full text is not provided here, the bill’s title and typical structure of fair-chance housing laws suggest the following core components:

  1. Prohibition on Certain Inquiries and Considerations

    • Restrictions on asking about or considering criminal history at early stages of the rental process (e.g., on rental applications or before a baseline screening).
    • Provisions that limit the use of criminal history in evaluating applicants, with exceptions for certain offenses or timeframes.

  2. Screening Standards and Procedures

    • Establishment of standardized screening criteria that landlords must follow.
    • Requirements for individualized assessments if criminal history is considered, including weighing the nature, severity, and relevance of offenses with respect to the tenancy and safety.

  3. Access and Notification Requirements

    • Requirements for landlords to provide clear notification about screening processes, including any adverse action taken based on criminal history.
    • Timelines for decision-making and for applicants to respond to adverse actions or requests for additional information.

  4. Adverse Action Protections

    • Prohibitions on discriminatory practices based on criminal history for protected classes (e.g., race, gender, familial status) to prevent compounded disparities.
    • Provisions granting applicants the right to dispute or correct erroneous information.

  5. Penalties and Enforcement

    • Establishment of penalties for violations, potentially including fines, civil enforcement actions, or administrative remedies.
    • Roles for state agencies (likely the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency or a related housing/ civil rights agency) to enforce compliance.

  6. Education and Guidance

    • Requirements for statewide guidance or model policies for landlords and property managers.
    • Possible mandate for housing providers to adopt fair-chance policies within a specified timeframe.

  7. Definitions and Scope

    • Clear definitions of key terms (e.g., “criminal history,” “adverse action,” “landlord,” “housing,” “tenant screening”).
    • Scope clarifications on which housing types are covered (e.g., rental properties, cooperatives, Housing Choice Vouchers, public housing) and any exemptions.

Who Would Be Affected

  • Tenant/Applicant Population: Individuals with prior arrests or convictions seeking rental housing would benefit from reduced barriers and fairer evaluation criteria.
  • Landlords and Property Managers: Agencies and private landlords would need to adjust screening practices to comply with new standards, adopt fair-chance policies, and ensure non-discriminatory practices.
  • Housing Providers and Agencies: Public housing authorities, property management firms, and landlords participating in rental markets, including those using screening services.
  • Enforcement Bodies: State agencies responsible for housing policy and civil rights enforcement would oversee compliance and penalties.

Procedural and Timeline Considerations

  • Committee Path: Referred to the Housing Finance and Policy committee for review and amendments.
  • Potential Implementation Timeline: If enacted, effective dates typically follow enacted rulemaking or a specified compliance window (e.g., 6–12 months post-enactment), with phased rollout for landlords and housing providers.
  • Enforcement Horizon: Penalties imposed for violations would become actionable upon enactment and corresponding regulatory guidance.

Practical Implications

  • Aimed at reducing racial and socioeconomic disparities in housing access associated with criminal history.
  • Could increase the availability of rental units for individuals with criminal records by limiting blanket exclusions.
  • Requires landlords to justify adverse actions with individualized assessments, potentially improving fairness but requiring training and record-keeping.
  • May necessitate updates to rental applications, screening policies, and tenant screening workflows.

Note to Readers

This summary reflects the bill’s stated intent and typical features of fair-chance housing legislation based on its title and available action history. For precise language, definitions, specific penalties, exemptions, and implementation dates, consult the bill’s full text and any drafting notes issued by the Minnesota Legislature or the sponsoring committees.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.