WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 279

Military - As enacted, defines "working day" for purposes of determining the military leave and compensation available to state and local government employees who are members of any reserve component of the armed forces of the United States who are called to active military service. - Amends TCA Title 8, Chapter 33.

114th Regular Session (2025-2026) Introduced by Ed Jackson

SB 279 defines "working day" for Tennessee state and local government employees on military reserve duty to standardize leave and compensation calculations during active service activation.

Pub. Ch. 243
#military
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 279

Legislative bill overview

SB 279 clarifies the definition of "working day" under Tennessee law for calculating military leave and compensation for state and local government employees who are members of armed forces reserve components called to active duty. The bill amends Tennessee Code Annotated Title 8, Chapter 33, which governs employee leave policies. By establishing a precise definition, it removes ambiguity in how much paid leave and compensation these employees receive when activated.

Why is this important

Military reserve and National Guard members often serve in dual roles as civilian government employees, and unclear leave definitions can create disputes over pay and benefits during activation. A clear statutory definition ensures consistent treatment across state and local agencies, protects employee compensation rights, and provides administrative clarity for HR departments. This affects thousands of Tennessee government workers who may be called to federal service.

Potential points of contention

  • Definition specificity: Without seeing the actual definition enacted, it's unclear whether "working day" includes weekends, holidays, or partial days—each interpretation could significantly affect compensation calculations
  • Retroactive application: If the definition differs from past practice, questions may arise about whether it applies only prospectively or affects prior military service claims
  • Local government consistency: State and local governments may interpret or implement the definition differently, potentially creating inequitable treatment across jurisdictions

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.