WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HF 1134

Metropolitan Land Planning Act requirements and authority amended.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Steve Elkins

The bill would change the Metropolitan Land Planning Act’s requirements and authority, altering how regional land use plans are developed, coordinated, and overseen.

Motion to recall and re-refer, motion prevailed Elections Finance and Government Operations
#governmentaloperations-local #landuseandzoning #metropolitanarea
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HF 1134

Summary of HF 1134 (2025-2026) – Minnesota: Metropolitan Land Planning Act requirements and authority amended

Overview

HF 1134 is a Minnesota bill that proposes amendments to the Metropolitan Land Planning Act, altering the requirements, scope, and authority related to land use planning and development within the metropolitan area. The bill currently has one named co-sponsor: Steve Elkins. The action history indicates that the bill was introduced (February 19, 2025) and subsequently recalled/re-referred on March 27, 2025, by the Elections Finance and Government Operations committee.

Purpose and intent

  • The bill aims to modify the Metropolitan Land Planning Act’s framework governing metropolitan area land use planning and related authority.
  • While the specific text of HF 1134 is not provided here, the bill’s title suggests changes to requirements and the authority granted to metropolitan planning bodies, potentially affecting how land use decisions are made, reviewed, and implemented within the metropolitan region.

Key provisions and changes (as inferred from the bill’s title)

Note: The precise statutory language is not included in the provided information. The following highlights reflect typical areas such amendments might address, aligned with the bill’s title:
- Revisions to planning requirements: Possible updates to mandatory planning elements, timelines, or performance standards that planning authorities must meet.
- Authority adjustments: Potential changes to the powers of metropolitan planning organizations or authorities (e.g., scope of jurisdiction, decision-making processes, approvals, or oversight mechanisms).
- Consistency and coordination: Provisions to enhance coordination between city, county, and regional plans, with implications for zoning, transportation, housing, and infrastructure planning.
- Public engagement and transparency: Possible enhancements to public participation requirements or reporting standards for metropolitan plans.
- Role of state agencies: Potential adjustments to the involvement of state agencies in metropolitan planning oversight or review.

If the bill’s text becomes available, a detailed item-by-item summary should be prepared to specify exact amendments, new sections, deleted provisions, and cross-references to current law.

Who would be affected

  • Metropolitan planning authorities: Entities responsible for regional land use planning and implementation.
  • Municipalities within the metropolitan area: Cities and towns that must align local plans with updated regional requirements.
  • County governments: Counties that participate in or contribute to metropolitan plans.
  • Developers and property owners: Stakeholders seeking zoning, subdivision, and infrastructure approvals within the metropolitan region.
  • State agencies: Agencies with oversight or support roles in regional planning.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Introduction and referrals: HF 1134 was introduced on February 19, 2025 and referred to the State Government Finance and Policy committee.
  • Committee action: On March 27, 2025, a motion to recall and re-refer passed in the Elections Finance and Government Operations committee, indicating ongoing committee deliberation or re-routing to another committee for further discussion.
  • Next steps: The bill would typically proceed through additional committee hearings, potential amendments, and floor votes in the House, followed by passage to the Senate and potential conference committee, depending on the chamber of origin and legislative calendar.

Administrative notes

  • Sponsorship: House co-sponsor Steve Elkins.
  • For a precise understanding of the bill’s impact, it is essential to review the official bill text, fiscal note (if any), and committee analysis once available.
  • Public stakeholders may wish to track subsequent committee referrals and schedule updates for HF 1134 to monitor advancement and potential amendments.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.